Natural gas and renewable power are the main new sources of electric power added to the US grid. Various worldwide government incentives for renewable power have resulted in a tremendous growth in wind and solar installations that have improved efficiencies and reduced costs. As wind and solar reach parity with conventional electric power sources they will change the electric grid at a faster rate.
Figure 1 -Solar Power cost is now reaching parity with retail electric power
While smart cities and towns transition toward renewable wind and solar electricity production, Distributed Energy Resources (DER) will have a profound impact on the business model for utilities.
In addition to my role as an ARC consultant, I serve on the Board of Light Commissioners in a small town in Massachusetts. As a light commissioner, I know that we need to plan for future DER. As a town, we buy power from a supplier and the cost includes the energy and the transmission to get it to our town distribution system. We own and maintain our town distribution system so the retail customer is billed for energy, transmission, and distribution. As a municipal electric department, we can choose how to compensate our residents for distributed energy with our net metering policy. We could choose:
- Full retail rate compensation (energy, transmission and distribution)
- What the utility pays for power (energy plus transmission)
- No compensation
- Any other formula we choose
Depending on the net metering rate we choose and the penetration of DER (mostly solar), the rate the town would need to charge customers would increase depending on penetration and net metering rate. If penetration was just a few percent, the impact on remaining rate payers would be minor, but even without any net metering compensation, a high penetration of renewables would drive the utility to a business model as a backup power supplier, with a correspondingly premium rate. See Lawrence Berkeley Labs DOE April 2017 study: Financial Impacts of a Combined Energy Efficiency and Net-Metered PV Portfolio on a Prototypical Northeast Utility.
To understand how this works, suppose our town got to 100% DER, which means on average for the year our town produced as much energy as it consumed. Suppose our retail rate to our customers was 20 cents per kW*hr and this cost was 7 cents for energy, 3 cents for transmission, and 10 cents for local distribution. In this case, we could, in principal, save 7+3 or 10 cents as we would not need to buy any power. In practice, this is not so simple. If our DER were mostly solar, we would produce much more than we needed during the sunny summer months and we would need to find a service that could buy this extra production for us and supply it in December and January when we have much less sun. Such a service would be quite hard to find. The technical problem is storing such a vast quantity of energy for such a long time. Batteries, pumped hydro, CAES, and most other energy storage technologies could not do this economically. It is likely that new and creative ways to put excess summer power to better uses will come along.
The financial problem is more concerning as our utility still needs to maintain reliability and find a fair way to charge customers that are using less power.
Figure 2 Percent change in power price
Figure 2 above is using the model in the Lawrence Berkeley Labs DOE April 2017 study. Note that a combination of high net metering rate and high penetration will increase the cost of power to all customers. If we do not compensate our customers for net metering, then this power could displace purchased power and reduce rates assuming all customers stay on the grid and do not install batteries. This neglects problem of finding a power provider for the town that would need to both buy and sell power if our town gets to a high DER penetration rate.
A homeowner with a PV system and full retail rate net metering could expect if they got to net zero power (PV power that meets their yearly needs), then their cost for electric power should be zero. Unfortunately, if the utility gave all homeowners full retail rate net metering, at 100% town penetration, there would be no revenue for maintaining the distribution system. This would become evident well before DER penetration got to even 50%. If the utility rates increase to cover the costs of maintaining the distribution system as penetration is increased, that further increases the incentive of customers to install a PV system and to find new ways to conserve much to the rate shock of those homeowner that did not get the message, i.e. the town is switching from central station to DER power. This feedback mechanism has been called the “utility death spiral.”
On the one hand, customers that install a renewable DER system are helping to meet local, state, federal, and world goals to move to a sustainable clean energy model. On the other hand, massive DER penetration represents a fundamental shift from central station power that has an enormous impact on generating stations (both base power and peaking units), transmission operators, and the local distribution networks.
With PV power achieving parity, our small-town utility may eventually be morphing into a role of energy storage broker and backup power supplier. It will take decades for this transition and we could get surprised if some new low-cost central station technology (like nuclear fusion) comes along, or if government incentives, or regulations push us into a different direction. Watching the recent trends, it does appear the smart city of the future will move to a more DER-based grid, with new and better energy storage methods, and they will need new smart utilities to support their new customer needs. Although we have yet to see any towns close to 100% DER penetration, the effect is proportional and those utilities that offer high rates for excess DER generation and encourage energy conservation will accelerate the DER penetration and the transition of the utility to backup power provider and a broker for selling excess DER power.
While this phenomenon has been called the utility death spiral, it may be better understood as the birth of a new utility electric grid and utility business model.
About ARC Advisory Group (www.arcweb.com): Founded in 1986, ARC Advisory Group is a Boston based leading technology research and advisory firm for industry and infrastructure.
For further information or to provide feedback on this article, please firstname.lastname@example.org
Rick is a senior consultant at ARC. He performs research into and consults with clients on technology areas such as process automation, energy management, advanced process control (APC), simulation, and optimization.