Feedback on easing out procedural challenges under the Patents Act, 1970

Terms of use

Terms of Use

The use of this site and the content contained therein is governed by the Terms of Use. When you use this site you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Use and that you accept and will be bound by the terms hereof and such terms as may be modified from time to time.

All text, graphics, audio, design and other works on the site are the copyrighted works of nasscom unless otherwise indicated. All rights reserved.
Content on the site is for personal use only and may be downloaded provided the material is kept intact and there is no violation of the copyrights, trademarks, and other proprietary rights. Any alteration of the material or use of the material contained in the site for any other purpose is a violation of the copyright of nasscom and / or its affiliates or associates or of its third-party information providers. This material cannot be copied, reproduced, republished, uploaded, posted, transmitted or distributed in any way for non-personal use without obtaining the prior permission from nasscom.
The nasscom Members login is for the reference of only registered nasscom Member Companies.
nasscom reserves the right to modify the terms of use of any service without any liability. nasscom reserves the right to take all measures necessary to prevent access to any service or termination of service if the terms of use are not complied with or are contravened or there is any violation of copyright, trademark or other proprietary right.
From time to time nasscom may supplement these terms of use with additional terms pertaining to specific content (additional terms). Such additional terms are hereby incorporated by reference into these Terms of Use.

Disclaimer

The Company information provided on the nasscom web site is as per data collected by companies. nasscom is not liable on the authenticity of such data.
nasscom has exercised due diligence in checking the correctness and authenticity of the information contained in the site, but nasscom or any of its affiliates or associates or employees shall not be in any way responsible for any loss or damage that may arise to any person from any inadvertent error in the information contained in this site. The information from or through this site is provided "as is" and all warranties express or implied of any kind, regarding any matter pertaining to any service or channel, including without limitation the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and non-infringement are disclaimed. nasscom and its affiliates and associates shall not be liable, at any time, for any failure of performance, error, omission, interruption, deletion, defect, delay in operation or transmission, computer virus, communications line failure, theft or destruction or unauthorised access to, alteration of, or use of information contained on the site. No representations, warranties or guarantees whatsoever are made as to the accuracy, adequacy, reliability, completeness, suitability or applicability of the information to a particular situation.
nasscom or its affiliates or associates or its employees do not provide any judgments or warranty in respect of the authenticity or correctness of the content of other services or sites to which links are provided. A link to another service or site is not an endorsement of any products or services on such site or the site.
The content provided is for information purposes alone and does not substitute for specific advice whether investment, legal, taxation or otherwise. nasscom disclaims all liability for damages caused by use of content on the site.
All responsibility and liability for any damages caused by downloading of any data is disclaimed.
nasscom reserves the right to modify, suspend / cancel, or discontinue any or all sections, or service at any time without notice.

For any grievances under the Information Technology Act 2000, please get in touch with Grievance Officer, Mr. Anirban Mandal at data-query@nasscom.in.

New

See all

No notification found.

Feedback on easing out procedural challenges under the Patents Act, 1970

Sudipto

@Sudipto

July 25, 2023

Public Policy

114

Nasscom submitted its detailed feedback to the DPIIT, Ministry of Commerce and Industry on how to further strengthen the Patents Act, 1970 with respect to promote innovation and ease of doing business. This extensive review was undertaken pursuant to a public consultation held by the DPIIT on March 10,2023. The consultation was called to discuss reform with respect to these three items reflects the government’s intent to strengthen the innovation ecosystem and the Indian patent regime.

Our feedback highlights how to ease out procedural challenges with the extant pre-grant opposition process, compliance complications arising out of Section 8 and information sought under Form 27. We have provided seven recommendations covering three agendas/areas as highlighted below:

The pre-grant opposition should be limited either to issuance of FER or post issuance of FER with a fixed time frame. At present, pre-grant opposition can be filed anytime from the date of publication of patent application until the patent is granted. US, UK, and Australia have a clear timeline for pre-grant opposition or permit limited intervention during this stage. (See Annexure I of attachment for section on the global position). In the absence of any fixed pre-grant stage timelines, the process becomes open-ended in India which substantially delays in grant of patents. This lacuna has been abused by parties with no locus standi, to stall the process (Please see refer page 4 of Detailed Recommendations - section on frivolous complaints). The problem gets aggravated because India like many other countries does not have a patent term adjustment where time lost in prosecution of patents is accommodated in the term of the patent (See, Annexure II on global position in the attachment). Moreover, the India Patents Act allows a right of post-grant opposition, where a person can raise opposition within 1 year after the grant of patent.

2. The need to intimate the Controller about every foreign patent application under Section 8 is redundant as India is now an International Search Authority (ISO) and a member of the Paris Convention and the WIPO CASE, so it has access to extensive corresponding patent applications. Publicly available databases provide access to information for the same family such as wipo.int; google patents; Pat seer; Orbit, etc all of which are accessible by the Patent office and the public. However, a violation of this provision exposes the applicant to revocation of patent & criminal liability.

3. Form 27 requirement appears to be unique to India (See, Annexure III, Table II of the attachment). The purpose of working status of a patented invention (Form 27) is to be a ground for granting compulsory license. The rationalisation of Form 27 vide Patent amendment Rules 2020 was an appreciable step, but the problems remain.

The abovementioned challenges results in the patent granting process taking 2-3 times more time than jurisdictions like in the U.S. and Japan. The average pendency time for final decision at the Indian Patent office is 50 months compared to 15.3 in Japan, 18.5 in China or 21.2 in USA. In 2021, 61,573 applications were filed in India as compared to 1.59 million in China. The number of patents being filed in India are relatively low. The problem of delays could exacerbate as patent applications rise in future with increasing innovations. Worse, the time-consuming process could deter patent fling.

The data above is documented in our recent report “Unpacking India’s IP Ecosystem- For an Innovation-led Future” (2023). In the survey for the above report, we found that the challenges arising out the extant pre-grant opposition, S. 8, and Form 27 (frivolous opposition/litigation led delays, disproportionate compliance obligations, and fear of exposing sensitive business information), disincentivises patentees in India.

Please see the attachment for our detailed set of recommendations with justification.

For further details on this subject, please write to Sudipto Banerjee at sudipto@nasscom.in, with a copy to policy@nasscom.in.

Patents Act Form 27 Pre grant opposition patents Innovation EoDB

Disclaimer

That the contents of third-party articles/blogs published here on the website, and the interpretation of all information in the article/blogs such as data, maps, numbers, opinions etc. displayed in the article/blogs and views or the opinions expressed within the content are solely of the author's; and do not reflect the opinions and beliefs of NASSCOM or its affiliates in any manner. NASSCOM does not take any liability w.r.t. content in any manner and will not be liable in any manner whatsoever for any kind of liability arising out of any act, error or omission. The contents of third-party article/blogs published, are provided solely as convenience; and the presence of these articles/blogs should not, under any circumstances, be considered as an endorsement of the contents by NASSCOM in any manner; and if you chose to access these articles/blogs , you do so at your own risk.

Download Attachment

Sudipto

Nasscom Public Policy Highlights | ...

Sudipto