The use of this site and the content contained therein is governed by the Terms of Use. When you use this site you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Use and that you accept and will be bound by the terms hereof and such terms as may be modified from time to time.
All text, graphics, audio, design and other works on the site are the copyrighted works of nasscom unless otherwise indicated. All rights reserved.
Content on the site is for personal use only and may be downloaded provided the material is kept intact and there is no violation of the copyrights, trademarks, and other proprietary rights. Any alteration of the material or use of the material contained in the site for any other purpose is a violation of the copyright of nasscom and / or its affiliates or associates or of its third-party information providers. This material cannot be copied, reproduced, republished, uploaded, posted, transmitted or distributed in any way for non-personal use without obtaining the prior permission from nasscom.
The nasscom Members login is for the reference of only registered nasscom Member Companies.
nasscom reserves the right to modify the terms of use of any service without any liability. nasscom reserves the right to take all measures necessary to prevent access to any service or termination of service if the terms of use are not complied with or are contravened or there is any violation of copyright, trademark or other proprietary right.
From time to time nasscom may supplement these terms of use with additional terms pertaining to specific content (additional terms). Such additional terms are hereby incorporated by reference into these Terms of Use.
Disclaimer
The Company information provided on the nasscom web site is as per data collected by companies. nasscom is not liable on the authenticity of such data.
nasscom has exercised due diligence in checking the correctness and authenticity of the information contained in the site, but nasscom or any of its affiliates or associates or employees shall not be in any way responsible for any loss or damage that may arise to any person from any inadvertent error in the information contained in this site. The information from or through this site is provided "as is" and all warranties express or implied of any kind, regarding any matter pertaining to any service or channel, including without limitation the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and non-infringement are disclaimed. nasscom and its affiliates and associates shall not be liable, at any time, for any failure of performance, error, omission, interruption, deletion, defect, delay in operation or transmission, computer virus, communications line failure, theft or destruction or unauthorised access to, alteration of, or use of information contained on the site. No representations, warranties or guarantees whatsoever are made as to the accuracy, adequacy, reliability, completeness, suitability or applicability of the information to a particular situation.
nasscom or its affiliates or associates or its employees do not provide any judgments or warranty in respect of the authenticity or correctness of the content of other services or sites to which links are provided. A link to another service or site is not an endorsement of any products or services on such site or the site.
The content provided is for information purposes alone and does not substitute for specific advice whether investment, legal, taxation or otherwise. nasscom disclaims all liability for damages caused by use of content on the site.
All responsibility and liability for any damages caused by downloading of any data is disclaimed.
nasscom reserves the right to modify, suspend / cancel, or discontinue any or all sections, or service at any time without notice.
For any grievances under the Information Technology Act 2000, please get in touch with Grievance Officer, Mr. Anirban Mandal at data-query@nasscom.in.
Diving deep into the nuances of both Public blockchains
Polygon PoS and Polygon zkEVM are two different public blockchains within the Polygon ecosystem, each with its own characteristics and role. In this article, we will explore the main differences between Polygon PoS and Polygon zkEVM across architecture, capabilities, use cases and roadmaps. Understanding the nuances of both layer 2 scaling solutions empowers developers to pick the ideal platform.
Diving into the Technical Architectures
Polygon PoS relies on a Plasma framework in conjunction with a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) based consensus mechanism to implement a sidechain that runs in parallel to Ethereum mainnet. This sidechain offers increased bandwidth for transactions while still benefitting from the security guarantees of Ethereum.
In contrast, Polygon zkEVM employs ZK-rollup technology to provide a layer 2 scaling solution directly on top of Ethereum mainnet. ZK-rollups allow intensive computation to happen off-chain, while succinct cryptographic proofs are generated and submitted on-chain to attest the correctness of all off-chain activity.
Delving deeper into the Polygon PoS and Polygon zkEVM difference, let’s discuss their distinct technical architectures.
Consensus Mechanisms
Polygon PoS relies on around 100 PoS validators who stake MATIC tokens to participate in consensus and validate transactions on the sidechain. Block producers are selected deterministically based on the largest staked deposits.
In comparison, Polygon zkEVM leverages highly permissionless Consensus Contracts that coordinate a decentralized network of Proposers and Verifiers to batch transactions off-chain and generate proofs. Proposers (sequencers) propose blocks of transactions, form validity proofs and submit to chain. Verifiers sample and verify the proofs before confirming blocks. No staking or special roles required.
This key difference around consensus between Polygon PoS and zkEVM arises due to the fact that PoS is a direct consensus mechanism that requires validators to attest state, whereas zkEVM relies on validity proofs where multiple parties can participate freely to build proofs of correctness.
Data Availability
On Polygon PoS, all transaction data and state is readily available directly on its sidechain. Having data on-chain allows for fast retrieval and cross-referencing, which aids in tasks like reconciliation. But it comes at the cost of extra storage overhead on the sidechain.
In comparison to Polygon PoS, Polygon zkEVM offers a couple of different data availability options:
Validium – Data is maintained off-chain in this mode, offering storage efficiency. Only validity proofs are posted to Ethereum mainchain. Retrieval is slower but verification is faster.
Volition – A hybrid option where certain data deemed crucial can optionally be stored directly on-chain while the rest remains off-chain. This offers a balance between efficiency and faster access.
By optimizing data availability, ZK rollups are able to reduce the burden and fees for data storage on the mainchain.
Interoperability and Bridges
A key difference arises in interoperability with Ethereum. Polygon PoS has a separate isolated sidechain running in parallel to Ethereum. Assets can be transferred between the sidechain and mainchain via bridges, but there is no direct interoperability. It validates transfers via PoS validators and confirms delivery. The PoS chain and Ethereum remain separate networks only connected by the bridge.
Adding to the Polygon PoS and Polygon zkEVM difference, The zkEVM bridge enables asset transfers between zkEVM and other networks like Ethereum mainnet using “lock” and “mint” functions and wrapped tokens. It utilizes exit trees and Global Exit Tree roots to synchronize state between source and destination networks. It utilizes exit trees and Global Exit Tree roots to synchronize state between source and destination networks.
Analyzing Core Capabilities:
There are several core capability differences between Polygon PoS and zkEVM in areas like throughput, fees, finality guarantees and more:
Smart Contract Execution
Polygon PoS offers EVM-compatibility by utilizing the Ethereum Virtual Machine to execute smart contracts on its sidechain. This allows developers to port Solidity contracts from mainnet to PoS with minimal changes. However, there can be subtle execution differences between EVM on mainnet versus sidechains. So, in some cases where developers need to deal with intricate dapp configurations or may be low-level code, they might have to make certain changes for sidechain-specific features when working with PoS chain.
Polygon zkEVM aims for full EVM-equivalence, which guarantees compatibility and identical execution as Ethereum mainnet. This allows developers to deploy unmodified contracts and tooling from mainnet to zkEVM for a frictionless experience.
Hence, Polygon zkEVM is kind of a near-perfect replica of Ethereum’s execution environment. But Polygon PoS is focused on offering compatibility with Ethereum smart contracts EVM within the context of a sidechain.
Throughput
Polygon PoS has a theoretical limit of achieving 7200 TPS, but in reality they have seen throughput of around 1000 TPS. High throughput is determined by the gas limit.
In comparison, Polygon zkEVM also aims to achieve a similar kind of throughput like PoS, but basically because of the rollups architecture, and higher security the throughput could be little less compared to side chain. Though actual throughput will depend on implementation details.
Fees
Both networks offer highly cost-efficient transactions compared to native Ethereum mainnet. However, Polygon zkEVM generally has marginally higher fees than Polygon PoS currently, though still negligible in absolute terms. At the moment, the average transaction cost on the Polygon PoS chain is somewhere around $0.015/transaction.
This minor fee difference arises because the Validity Proofs required by zkEVM require more complex computation than PoS consensus, impacting fee economics slightly. Average cost for transaction is 0.000070 ETH/$0.11 for zkEVM
Finality
Finality refers to the time taken for a transaction to be considered irreversible. Polygon PoS offers fast finality of around 1 minute due to its high speed sidechain.
Here the key difference between Polygon PoS and zkEvM is that, Polygon zkEVM can offer nearly instant finality for transactions since validity proofs submitted on Ethereum provide probabilistic finality as soon as they are verified.
Use cases & Adoption:
Due to their different capabilities, Polygon PoS and zkEVM are suited for different applications:
Because of the high throughput and negligible fees, Polygon PoS is better suited for applications where the dApp needs to handle high volume transactions. It could be trading applications, Web3 gaming and social dApps, micro DeFi and similar applications.
Polygon zkEVM is ideal for use cases like high-value DeFi applications, Yield firming where the security is the priority even if fees are slightly higher, but don’t require very high throughput.
Talking about the adoption, The PoS ecosystem has considerable maturity with over tens of thousands of dApp deployed on the chain. The current TVL is $687M. The PoS chain powers the most popular brands in their web3 efforts. Reddit, Stripe, Starbucks, Bulgari, and many more are on Polygon.
On the other hand, zkEVM ecosystem is quite new but rapidly expanding too with many major projects migrating to it to meet their requirements and take the benefit of Zero-knowledge proofs. It’s current TVL is around $56M.
The EVM equivalence of zkEVM allows projects to deploy unmodified contracts from Ethereum with minimal friction. This makes it easy for Ethereum native applications to “go multi-chain” on zkEVM. Emerging segments like passwordless authentication, private transactions, confidential computing etc would also gravitate to the privacy guarantees and validity proofs offered by zkEVM.
PoS to zkEVM Validium Upgrade
Polygon is considering upgrading its existing PoS network to use zkEVM validium architecture. This would allow Polygon PoS to leverage zero-knowledge proofs to verify the validity of transaction batches that are executed and stored off-chain. The goal is massive improvements in scalability.
The upgrade aims to retain the capabilities of high throughput, low fees, and EVM compatibility that have made Polygon PoS popular – while also gaining the benefits of zkEVM’s security proofs and interoperability.
Some key advantages of this zkValidium transition:
Adds security of zero-knowledge validity proofs to the fast, low-cost transactions of Polygon PoS.
Allows hybrid models and optional on-chain data availability enforced by blockchain.
Significantly boosts scalability as validiums reduce data burden on Ethereum compared to rollups/sidechains.
Validity proofs provide higher security guarantees than a standalone sidechain like Polygon PoS.
Creates an EVM-compatible validium, combining flexibility to support existing EVM apps and tools while improving scalability/security.
Leverages zero-knowledge proofs to validate transactions upfront, avoiding limitations like challenge periods faced by other scaling solutions.
In summary, this upgrade aims to transition Polygon PoS into an EVM-based zk validium that retains the capabilities and community of PoS while also unlocking interoperability, scalability, and security through integration of zkEVM innovations. The goal is the best of both worlds for developers and users.
About The Author
Dr. Ravi Chamria is co-founder CEO of Zeeve Inc, an Enterprise Blockchain company. He has an experience of 18+ years in IT consulting spanning across Fintech, InsureTech, Supply Chain and eCommerce. He is an executive MBA from IIM, Lucknow and a prolific speaker on emerging technologies like Blockchain, IoT and AI/ML.
Passionate About: Blockchain, Supply Chain Management, Digital Lending, Digital Payments, AI/ML, IoT
That the contents of third-party articles/blogs published here on the website, and the interpretation of all information in the article/blogs such as data, maps, numbers, opinions etc. displayed in the article/blogs and views or the opinions expressed within the content are solely of the author's; and do not reflect the opinions and beliefs of NASSCOM or its affiliates in any manner. NASSCOM does not take any liability w.r.t. content in any manner and will not be liable in any manner whatsoever for any kind of liability arising out of any act, error or omission. The contents of third-party article/blogs published, are provided solely as convenience; and the presence of these articles/blogs should not, under any circumstances, be considered as an endorsement of the contents by NASSCOM in any manner; and if you chose to access these articles/blogs , you do so at your own risk.
Zeeve is an enterprise-grade Blockchain Infrastructure Automation Platform. Join the growing list of clients that trust us with their Blockchain initiatives
Introduction
In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, the integration of blockchain and the Internet of Things (IoT) has emerged as a groundbreaking concept. The fusion of these two innovative technologies promises to revolutionize various…
While appchains are becoming increasingly popular in the web3 space due to their composability and flexibility benefits, most of the existing appchain ecosystems are associated with challenges such as lack of cross-chain interoperability and ‘walled…
The blockchain’s trilemma of scalability has created various sustainability challenges for web3 projects. However, Layer2 solutions like Rollups have tackled this issue well. Blockchain startups with a huge number of users and high traffic…
Polygon Supernets is a new-age AppChain framework that allows a variety of enterprises, including public sectors, to launch custom-fitted, application-oriented blockchains. Talking about the public sector, we have seen that the iteration of…
Have you ever held a fresh apple and wondered about its journey? And where did it come from? What farm grew this apple? Was it sprayed with harmful chemicals? How long did it take to get from the tree to your hands? If you're like most consumers,…
Specific projects while using the public or permissive blockchain unequivocally face an imminent challenge of standardization because of the existing tech stacks that public and permissive blockchains use. To deal with this issue, appchains …
