The use of this site and the content contained therein is governed by the Terms of Use. When you use this site you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Use and that you accept and will be bound by the terms hereof and such terms as may be modified from time to time.
All text, graphics, audio, design and other works on the site are the copyrighted works of nasscom unless otherwise indicated. All rights reserved.
Content on the site is for personal use only and may be downloaded provided the material is kept intact and there is no violation of the copyrights, trademarks, and other proprietary rights. Any alteration of the material or use of the material contained in the site for any other purpose is a violation of the copyright of nasscom and / or its affiliates or associates or of its third-party information providers. This material cannot be copied, reproduced, republished, uploaded, posted, transmitted or distributed in any way for non-personal use without obtaining the prior permission from nasscom.
The nasscom Members login is for the reference of only registered nasscom Member Companies.
nasscom reserves the right to modify the terms of use of any service without any liability. nasscom reserves the right to take all measures necessary to prevent access to any service or termination of service if the terms of use are not complied with or are contravened or there is any violation of copyright, trademark or other proprietary right.
From time to time nasscom may supplement these terms of use with additional terms pertaining to specific content (additional terms). Such additional terms are hereby incorporated by reference into these Terms of Use.
Disclaimer
The Company information provided on the nasscom web site is as per data collected by companies. nasscom is not liable on the authenticity of such data.
nasscom has exercised due diligence in checking the correctness and authenticity of the information contained in the site, but nasscom or any of its affiliates or associates or employees shall not be in any way responsible for any loss or damage that may arise to any person from any inadvertent error in the information contained in this site. The information from or through this site is provided "as is" and all warranties express or implied of any kind, regarding any matter pertaining to any service or channel, including without limitation the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and non-infringement are disclaimed. nasscom and its affiliates and associates shall not be liable, at any time, for any failure of performance, error, omission, interruption, deletion, defect, delay in operation or transmission, computer virus, communications line failure, theft or destruction or unauthorised access to, alteration of, or use of information contained on the site. No representations, warranties or guarantees whatsoever are made as to the accuracy, adequacy, reliability, completeness, suitability or applicability of the information to a particular situation.
nasscom or its affiliates or associates or its employees do not provide any judgments or warranty in respect of the authenticity or correctness of the content of other services or sites to which links are provided. A link to another service or site is not an endorsement of any products or services on such site or the site.
The content provided is for information purposes alone and does not substitute for specific advice whether investment, legal, taxation or otherwise. nasscom disclaims all liability for damages caused by use of content on the site.
All responsibility and liability for any damages caused by downloading of any data is disclaimed.
nasscom reserves the right to modify, suspend / cancel, or discontinue any or all sections, or service at any time without notice.
For any grievances under the Information Technology Act 2000, please get in touch with Grievance Officer, Mr. Anirban Mandal at data-query@nasscom.in.
Slow charging time, along with other hurdles like range anxiety, has been plaguing EV adoption for many years now. While charging overnight from AC mains supply at home is really slow, Fast DC chargers at the roadside and along highways help charge the car battery within a reasonable time. Charging time depends on multiple variables, such as the charging station’s power, battery capacity, charging capability of the car and ambient temperature. One needs to be careful in equalizing these variables while making comparisons to avoid ending up with inaccurate judgments. While the industry has responded with Fast chargers and innovations in Ultra-Fast charging technologies, battery designs haven’t quite kept pace. High costs of installation and charging, widespread compatibility issues across EVs and the potential impact on battery life have been blockers in a resolution to the charging time problem.
Introduction
How would you react when told that your electric car could now charge fully in only a few minutes? Or, if you don’t have an EV already, is the charging time a mental block for considering buying one? Well, the solution may just have arrived. Announced by ABB in the fall of 2021 as the world’s fastest electric car charger, the Terra360 fully charges an electric car in under 15 minutes!
Generations of petrol/diesel car users have enjoyed fill up times of only a few minutes. Even a fill up from empty to full tank takes hardly 5–10 minutes. Whereas users of electric cars (both pluggable hybrid and battery electric) have learned to wait patiently for at least an hour or more after hooking up the car to a public charging station for getting fully charged — a stark contrast, indeed! For instance, the Tata Nexon EV specifies around 60 minutes to charge from 10% to 80% from a Fast DC charger, as an acquaintance of mine confirms with his 2 years old model. While Hyundai Kona EV specifies 0% to 80% in 57 minutes. “Why only 80%, why not 100%” would be the natural question, which we will address a bit later. (*)
Charging levels
The stereotype of charging at a public charging station is technically called Level-3 charging, or more commonly as Fast Charging. However, this isn’t the only way of charging. An electric car could be charged at home as well although much more slowly, a convenience that petrol/diesel car users never had. Charging from an AC charger located in the garage or parking lot from a power socket of 15–16A rating, which would typically take 7–10 hours for a full charge, is technically called Level-2 charging. For instance, the Tata Nexon EV specifies around 9 hours and 10 minutes to charge from 10% to 90% from a 15A AC socket, which was confirmed by the same acquaintance. While Hyundai Kona EV specifies around 6 hours for 0% to 100% charge. This way is ideal for overnight charging.
ABB Terra 54kW DC Fast Charger (Image courtesy: ABB)Schneider Electric “EVLink” 7.4kW AC Home Charger (Image courtesy: Schneider Electric)
Slow charging from a domestic AC charger is not a concern for most users since it happens overnight, conveniently. But when it comes to charging at a public charging station, especially in the middle of a long journey at the roadside or along the highway, that is when the charging time becomes a serious concern. In fact, charging time is acknowledged as one of the adoption hurdles for most petrol/diesel users thinking of switching over to electric. That is exactly where the likes of Terra360 deliver the knockout punch! (**)
Battery charge rate measurement
Let’s take a moment to peep under the hood to understand why electric charge won’t flow into a car battery as quickly as petrol/diesel flows into the fuel tank, why even “fast” charging has been relatively slow! The Lithium Ion battery, the most prominent chemistry of today, charges at a fairly uniform rate (for example, 5% charge in every 4 minutes) up to a threshold of around 80%. Minor variations could exist in the threshold value across battery designs. Beyond that threshold, the last lap to 100% charge takes up almost the same amount of additional time. Incidentally that last lap isn’t desirable for Lithium Ion battery either.
(*) That is why most manufacturers limit it to 80% charge while specifying charging time.
Further, the rate of charging is a function of several variables like (but not limited to) power output of the charging station, the car’s battery capacity and the charging capability of the car. Ambient temperature also impacts charging rate, although to a lesser degree. So, while comparing charging times across different vehicle makes/models, if one is not careful enough in equalizing most of the variables if not all, then one could end up with an unrealistic comparison.
For instance, the battery capacity could vary across EVs — like 30.2 kWh Li Ion battery for the Tata Nexon EV, versus 39.2 kWh Li Ion Polymer battery for the Hyundai Kona EV.
Similarly, without knowing whether the charger used was from Exicom or Delta Electronics and its power rating, a straight comparison between charging time measurements wouldn’t be a level playing field.
Delta Electronics 200kW Fast DC Charger (Image courtesy: Delta Electronics)Exicom 240kW DC Fast Charger (Image courtesy: Exicom)
The charging capability of the EV is determined by its Battery Management System (BMS), which is the intermediary that accepts power from the charging station and ensures that the battery gets charged efficiently and safely. The BMS controls the rate at which the battery pack is charged, equalizing cell voltages and ensuring temperatures do not rise up dangerously. Since BMS of each make/model vary in their characteristics, we can expect a resultant difference in charging rates, even with cars of the same battery capacity at the same charging station.
The State of Charge (SoC) or battery level before starting the charging operation has an obvious impact on the overall charging time. A battery would obviously take the longest time to fully charge when it in a fully discharged condition. To compensate for variations in the start SoC % and the end SoC % across different measurements, the metric “% charge added per charging time” or the charging rate (d/dt), is found more useful. That means we consider only the middle range of charge between 10% (or 20%) and 80%, and we measure what % of the battery gets charged (on an average, across multiple measurements, on the same battery), in how many minutes of charging time. One could argue that “range added per charging time”, a range rate metric, as used by many OEMs is a better metric. For instance, delivering 160 km of range in 3 minutes of charging. However, the range rate metric would also include the overall efficiency of the EV itself, including that of its traction motor, transmission system, regenerative braking, etc., and therefore it wouldn’t be an accurate metric of battery charging rate per se.
So how are Fast Chargers tested before they get approval for public use? At SFO Technologies (the flagship company of NeST group), we test our 50kW DC Fast Charger design by simulating a car battery. Setting a (virtual) battery capacity of 30.2kWh (similar to Tata Nexon EV), it takes typically around 26 minutes to charge from 10% to 80% of the (virtual) battery level. Since there is no real BMS in this test setup, this virtual d/dt reading cannot be compared to the charging time of a real car battery. Certification by the Automotive Research Association of India (ARAI) is expected in Q2 of 2023, after which charging times with actual EVs, like Tata Nexon, Hyundai Kona etc. could be measured.
Industry trends and issues
The industry has so far been approaching the resolution of charging time by pushing steadily for Fast Charging and more recently Ultra-Fast Charging, led by the iconic Tesla superchargers. There are however a few issues involved, the first to hit users being the charging cost. Compared to the cost of AC charging, the average charging cost for the user increases 4 to 6-fold for Fast charging and even more for Ultra-Fast charging. Infrastructure costs for the charging operator are also considerably higher for Fast Charging stations, and even more so for Ultra-Fast Charging stations. The latter may need the input feeder power equivalent of 5–6 households given their huge power rating, for instance the Terra360 delivers a whopping 360kW!
(**) However, launches of the likes of Terra360 do not address the “prime accused” of all adoption hurdles — range anxiety! That is where the battery chemistry wars are being fought today for improving EV range. Another parallel approach ongoing is to improve the density of charging infrastructure and predictability of its location, availability and compatibility, especially in vast geographies like India.
Another issue with Ultra-Fast Chargers is EV compatibility. Although Tesla eventually pivoted their proprietary super chargers to support the European standard (with CCS Combo2 outlet) in their European installations, the general compatibility across EV makes/models is still very limited. While a few manufacturers like ABB and Tesla have been focused on steadily increasing the charging capacity of their charging stations, it remains a tall order for the highly fragmented EV and battery manufacturing segments, which have been lagging in making major breakthroughs in battery design, to absorb the high rate of energy efficiently as well as safely. As a result, a large spectrum of EVs continues to remain incompatible with these Ultra-Fast Chargers. So, although ABB Terra360 did launch in 2021, the day when you and I could get fully charged in under 15 minutes no matter the make/model of EV, is still a while in the future.
Finally, at the physical level Ultra-Fast charging involves large currents in the 400A — 500A range flowing through the charging cable/connector that raises a lot of heat. Forced liquid cooling of the charging cables becomes mandatory, without which temperatures could shoot up dangerously. While occasional fast charging is generally considered safe for batteries, repeated fast charging (and ultra-fast charging) that elevates battery temperatures sharply and frequently, is known to be detrimental to the State of Health (SoH) or battery life. Given the imperfections of the BMS design, especially at extremes of ambient temperature or with mismatched cells, this has the potential to impact battery life.
Consumer concerns
Incidentally, high battery cost is the next in line to “range anxiety” among the adoption hurdles. The battery subsystem cost today stands at almost half the cost of the EV or more. In a price sensitive market such as India where the vast majority of consumers still view buying a car as a lifetime investment, and the maximum OEM battery warranty is still only around 8 years or 160000 km, the prospect of depreciation of the EV at the end of battery life/warranty is paralyzing! It is hardly surprising that even after several incentive schemes from different tiers of government, the much-awaited electric revolution is yet to flood a large market like India. And no wonder why the ABB Terra360 didn’t raise millions of eyebrows on the subcontinent!
Conclusion
In conclusion, the cost of fast charging which depends on the utility tariffs and pricing plans set by charging infrastructure operators may eventually start to come down as demand picks up as well as the density of charging infrastructure gets better. As Ultra-Fast charging technologies get more impetus from charger manufacturers, compatibility across EVs would probably continue to lag for some more time, since advances in battery design would take an independent cycle time to achieve. Meanwhile, the temperature and safety issues of Ultra-Fast chargers associated with the transfer of very high power will need to be assured for quick uptake among operators. Going by the industry’s pace of innovation in fast charging technologies, could the day be far off when one is not quite sure which one charges faster — a smartphone or an electric car?
About the author
Ram Mohan Ramakrishnan
Principal Consultant, Automotive
NeST Digital
That the contents of third-party articles/blogs published here on the website, and the interpretation of all information in the article/blogs such as data, maps, numbers, opinions etc. displayed in the article/blogs and views or the opinions expressed within the content are solely of the author's; and do not reflect the opinions and beliefs of NASSCOM or its affiliates in any manner. NASSCOM does not take any liability w.r.t. content in any manner and will not be liable in any manner whatsoever for any kind of liability arising out of any act, error or omission. The contents of third-party article/blogs published, are provided solely as convenience; and the presence of these articles/blogs should not, under any circumstances, be considered as an endorsement of the contents by NASSCOM in any manner; and if you chose to access these articles/blogs , you do so at your own risk.
NeST Digital, the software arm of the NeST Group, has been transforming businesses, providing customized and innovative software solutions and services for customers across the globe. A leader in providing end-to-end solutions under one roof, covering contract manufacturing and product engineering services, NeST has 25 years of proven experience in delivering industry-specific engineering and technology solutions for customers, ranging from SMBs to Fortune 500 enterprises, focusing on Transportation, Aerospace, Defense, Healthcare, Power, Industrial, GIS, and BFSI domains.
Energy such as electricity has become a basic need for human beings. The interesting fact about energy consumption is that 83% of the energy we use comes from fossil fuels, among which oil is the most significant energy source, followed by coal and…
The mobility industry, encompassing vehicles moving on land, air and water, is undergoing a digital transformation fueled by automation technology disruptions occurring at a rapid pace. The quantum of change expected in the next decade would be much…
We are on the verge of an engineering revolution that could change the way we live forever. There will be a huge economic impact as we move towards a world powered by renewables. But it is not just about economics - it is also about the environment…
While investment and sustainability might seem like two entirely opposite aspects, the recent climate trends have forced them to collide. Often the process of making investment concerns vetting a company based on factors including business model,…
As the state of the climate remains ever-worsening, and it continues to become increasingly evident that climate change is a problem we cannot hide from, many turn their heads towards large corporations and their hand in this. While many have…
Hospitals depend on energy to run their services, operate critical equipment and save lives. It's a vital operation but also an expensive one.
In England, the NHS spends £500 million a year on energy1 – making healthcare one of the nation's highest…
