The use of this site and the content contained therein is governed by the Terms of Use. When you use this site you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Use and that you accept and will be bound by the terms hereof and such terms as may be modified from time to time.
All text, graphics, audio, design and other works on the site are the copyrighted works of nasscom unless otherwise indicated. All rights reserved.
Content on the site is for personal use only and may be downloaded provided the material is kept intact and there is no violation of the copyrights, trademarks, and other proprietary rights. Any alteration of the material or use of the material contained in the site for any other purpose is a violation of the copyright of nasscom and / or its affiliates or associates or of its third-party information providers. This material cannot be copied, reproduced, republished, uploaded, posted, transmitted or distributed in any way for non-personal use without obtaining the prior permission from nasscom.
The nasscom Members login is for the reference of only registered nasscom Member Companies.
nasscom reserves the right to modify the terms of use of any service without any liability. nasscom reserves the right to take all measures necessary to prevent access to any service or termination of service if the terms of use are not complied with or are contravened or there is any violation of copyright, trademark or other proprietary right.
From time to time nasscom may supplement these terms of use with additional terms pertaining to specific content (additional terms). Such additional terms are hereby incorporated by reference into these Terms of Use.
Disclaimer
The Company information provided on the nasscom web site is as per data collected by companies. nasscom is not liable on the authenticity of such data.
nasscom has exercised due diligence in checking the correctness and authenticity of the information contained in the site, but nasscom or any of its affiliates or associates or employees shall not be in any way responsible for any loss or damage that may arise to any person from any inadvertent error in the information contained in this site. The information from or through this site is provided "as is" and all warranties express or implied of any kind, regarding any matter pertaining to any service or channel, including without limitation the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and non-infringement are disclaimed. nasscom and its affiliates and associates shall not be liable, at any time, for any failure of performance, error, omission, interruption, deletion, defect, delay in operation or transmission, computer virus, communications line failure, theft or destruction or unauthorised access to, alteration of, or use of information contained on the site. No representations, warranties or guarantees whatsoever are made as to the accuracy, adequacy, reliability, completeness, suitability or applicability of the information to a particular situation.
nasscom or its affiliates or associates or its employees do not provide any judgments or warranty in respect of the authenticity or correctness of the content of other services or sites to which links are provided. A link to another service or site is not an endorsement of any products or services on such site or the site.
The content provided is for information purposes alone and does not substitute for specific advice whether investment, legal, taxation or otherwise. nasscom disclaims all liability for damages caused by use of content on the site.
All responsibility and liability for any damages caused by downloading of any data is disclaimed.
nasscom reserves the right to modify, suspend / cancel, or discontinue any or all sections, or service at any time without notice.
For any grievances under the Information Technology Act 2000, please get in touch with Grievance Officer, Mr. Anirban Mandal at data-query@nasscom.in.
Unlike fiat currencies, cryptocurrencies by nature are highly volatile, making them unsuitable for regular use. In a financial market, currencies are supposed to serve as mediums of exchange and storage modes for monetary value. This is the reason many users avoid taking payments in cryptocurrencies as it is hard to rely on their purchasing power. Stablecoins are cryptocurrencies either backed by an asset or designed as algorithmic stablecoins set to combine the best of both fiat and cryptocurrency worlds.
For instance, during the 2017 crypto bull run, Bitcoin rose from $5600 to $20000 before falling drastically back to slightly above the $6000 mark. The same trend cuts across the cryptocurrency market. This creates the ground for stablecoins, which are labeled to the prices of fiat currencies like the US dollar, and aren’t volatile like other cryptocurrencies.
Known for their price stability in a rather shaky market, stablecoins have proven to be worthwhile. By the end of 2020, the overall value of stablecoin assets had surpassed the $20 billion mark. Currently, the stablecoin market is estimated to be worth $100 billion.
The role of stablecoins
Since their inception, stablecoins have been seen as the middle ground between traditional currencies and cryptocurrencies. They provide the best of both worlds by providing the price stability available in traditional markets while also providing convenience and privacy seen in cryptocurrencies.
Independent custodians constantly regulate and maintain these underlying assets to control prices when required. Traditionally, custodians only move into a market to manage the supply and demand during drastic market movements. The result causes stablecoins valuations to remain free from wild fluctuations caused by inflation.
Notably, the first Stablecoin to enter the cryptocurrency space was Tether (USDT), launched on July 28, 2014. Currently, there are over 200 stablecoins available in the market, including Dai, USDC, True USD, Digix Gold, Havens Nomin, Binance USD, Gemini Dollar, and many more.
The rise of stablecoins has helped the growth of the Decentralized Finance (DeFi) space. Whether it be lending or borrowing, liquidity pools, yield farming, or staking pools, the stablecoins have been at the heart of DeFi.
Tezos blockchain provides solutions to thwart barriers to adoption for assets and innovative activities backed by a community of developers and validators. Tezos well-thought-out total cost of ownership and open participation promote collaborative workflows. Tezos smart contracts ensure maximum security.
Type of stablecoins
Usually, stablecoins are pegged to fiat currencies like the US dollar and the euro and commodities like oil, gold, or silver. Others are pegged to trading assets like forex reserves, while others are algorithmic.
Stablecoins can be further divided into four groups:
Fiat collateralized
As the name suggests, these are stablecoins with underlying fiat currency reserves. In addition, these stablecoins are regularly audited to ensure they comply with the set financial regulations.
Commodity collateralized
These currencies use hard assets such as gold, real estate, silver, oil, and many more. Many projects in the market prefer using gold as their collateralized asset. However, a few projects in the Middle East region use oil reserves to peg their stablecoin.
Crypto collateralized
These stablecoins have other cryptocurrencies in their reserves to serve as collateral. Notably, these types of stablecoins are usually over-collateralized. Therefore, before issuing any crypto-backed Stablecoin, project managers have to maintain a higher number of pegged assets in their reserves. This is done to overcome the high volatility of the reserved asset. For example, the Synthetix project demands about 600% over-collateralization for every USD Stablecoin issued.
Algorithmic Stablecoin
Algorithmic stablecoins are among recent developments within the Stablecoin market. These assets serve the same purpose as other stablecoins in the market. However, unlike their predecessors, they are not collateralized.
A dive into algorithmic stablecoins
Algorithmic stablecoins are pegged cryptocurrencies that automatically adjust their demand, supply, and other essential details to reduce their volatility. The asset to which the algorithmic asset is tied could be a fiat currency or a commodity like gold.
As mentioned above, algorithmic stablecoins do not use any reserve. Instead, they use an algorithm (smart contracts) or codes to mint and burn coins in response to the prevailing market conditions.
Currently, the longest-running algorithmic Stablecoin is Ampleforth (AMPL). Other Algorithmic stablecoins include DefiDollar (USDC), Terra Money, Basic Cash, Reserve, Debasonomics, Frax (FRAX), and Empty Set Dollar (ESD).
How do the Algorithmic Stablecoins Work?
Algorithmic stablecoins have a two-coin structure. The first coin absorbs market volatility. While the other coin actually a governance token keeps the peg. Terra earlier relied on the two-coin system and later included Bitcoin reserves. The interaction between the first and the second coin is required to keep the algorithmic stablecoin dollar value steady.
For instance, when the price of an algorithmic stablecoin valued at $1 increases above the pegged price, the algorithm mints new tokens, hoping that the new tokens will be sold off and drive down the price. On the other hand, if the price falls below the $1 value price, the algorithm burns some tokens hoping that the remaining tokens are valued higher than the previous price.
Types of Algorithmic Stablecoins
The algorithmic stablecoins are further divided into three categories:
Rebasing Algorithmic Stablecoins: The rebase algorithmic stablecoins work on the price-elasticity by ERC-20 tokens. In these coins, the price is modified regularly by adopting a rebase process.
Seigniorage Algorithmic Stablecoins: The seigniorage coins is further comprised of two types of crypto — stablecoin and seigniorage ownership. Shares are here to increase the supply of coins. A redeemable bond as an incentive is also issued by the coins when the prices fall.
Fractional Algorithmic Stablecoins: These algorithmic stablecoins are the combination of fully collateralized and fully algorithmic stablecoins. It has fewer custodial risks and shows a higher level of stability. Frax is the fractional algorithmic stablecoins that use partial-collateral protocol & has two-token architecture.
Pros of Algorithmic Stablecoins
Algorithmic stablecoins aim to increase capital efficiency by using codes to maintain prices near the pegged asset. These assets rely on smart contracts to supply tokens to the market if the value increases above the peg or sell tokens if the price falls below the peg.
Notably, algorithmic stablecoins provide true decentralization within the stablecoin market since they remove third-party interference, a popular commonality among traditional stablecoins. These stablecoins also eliminate the struggles that come with raising enough capital needed to serve as the reserve.
Another advantage of algorithmic stablecoins is that they allow more trust between the users and developers since the peg is closely tied to an algorithm and not collateral.
Cons of Algorithmic Stablecoins
The algorithmic stablecoins have a weak architecture and are vulnerable to de-pegging risk. The coins are largely affected by the demands thus no demand for coins can cause a price decrease.
The coins depend on investors who must be concerned about profiting from them. Sometimes, the herd mentality and decisions are taken from an emotional point of view resulting in selling the algorithmic stablecoins, causing a price drop.
Challenges faced by algorithmic stablecoins
While these assets provide a range of benefits, there are a few challenges as well. For example, creating an algorithmic stablecoin that maintains its peg is more complicated than it looks on paper. Generally, the process creates a few risks that could lead to the destruction of the entire project.
First, algorithmic stablecoins face the risk of increased and decreased supply each time the market shifts. If the asset price goes above the valued price, more tokens are minted by the algorithm. In this case, increased supply raises the question of who gets the new tokens. However, if the price goes below the value price, the algorithm is forced to burn the tokens. In some cases, it reduces the supply by offering bonds to buyers, who only get paid when the price rises above the valued price. Buyers can only hope the system will eventually even out and pay them for their purchases.
Another challenge is the reliance on oracle technologies since blockchains cannot access information outside their protocol. Algorithms use oracles to get prices from exchanges, compare the prices and adjust their system to maintain the balance. In this case, the data needs to be accurate in relation to the current price. Notably, it is always a challenge for developers or project managers to get the oracles right.
The last challenge is the risk of pegs separation (peg break). This occurs when a chain breaks away from the parent chain. A peg break is reportedly the worst-case scenario for any stablecoin. They have the strength to destabilize the algorithmic stablecoins causing price fluctuations that eventually could kill the entire project.
About The Author
Dr. Ravi Chamria is co-founder CEO of Zeeve Inc, an Enterprise Blockchain company. He has an experience of 18+ years in IT consulting spanning across Fintech, InsureTech, Supply Chain and eCommerce. He is an executive MBA from IIM, Lucknow and a prolific speaker on emerging technologies like Blockchain, IoT and AI/ML.
Passionate About: Blockchain, Supply Chain Management, Digital Lending, Digital Payments, AI/ML, IoT
That the contents of third-party articles/blogs published here on the website, and the interpretation of all information in the article/blogs such as data, maps, numbers, opinions etc. displayed in the article/blogs and views or the opinions expressed within the content are solely of the author's; and do not reflect the opinions and beliefs of NASSCOM or its affiliates in any manner. NASSCOM does not take any liability w.r.t. content in any manner and will not be liable in any manner whatsoever for any kind of liability arising out of any act, error or omission. The contents of third-party article/blogs published, are provided solely as convenience; and the presence of these articles/blogs should not, under any circumstances, be considered as an endorsement of the contents by NASSCOM in any manner; and if you chose to access these articles/blogs , you do so at your own risk.
Zeeve is an enterprise-grade Blockchain Infrastructure Automation Platform. Join the growing list of clients that trust us with their Blockchain initiatives
The world of blockchain has now an explosion in the number of active decentralized applications and users engaging with them. However, this surge in usage has also exposed the limitations of legacy blockchain architectures and gave birth to new…
Introduction to Blockchain Development for Supply Chain Management:
Blockchain technology has rapidly gained prominence in various industries, offering innovative solutions to longstanding challenges. In the realm of supply chain management,…
Whether you are building a dApp or you want to enhance the functionality of your existing web3 applications– you must need indexed on-chain data from a range of blockchains and decentralized networks. However, querying data out of the blockchain’…
Diving deep into the nuances of both Public blockchains
Polygon PoS and Polygon zkEVM are two different public blockchains within the Polygon ecosystem, each with its own characteristics and role. In this article, we will explore the main…
Rollups and Parachains– both are viable solutions for tackling the scalability issue from blockchain ecosystems. However, these two scaling solutions are designed differently to serve specific enterprise needs. As we know, Rollups uses the…
ERPs or Enterprise Resource Planning play an integral role by smoothing automation that impacts business segments like accounts, invoicing, supply chains, product procurement and risk management. That’s why Richard Cline, Innovation Managing…
