Here’s why C-Level Executives Should Stay Away From These 6 Cybersecurity Myths, says Priya Kanduri, VP, CTO, IMSS

Terms of use

Terms of Use

The use of this site and the content contained therein is governed by the Terms of Use. When you use this site you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Use and that you accept and will be bound by the terms hereof and such terms as may be modified from time to time.

All text, graphics, audio, design and other works on the site are the copyrighted works of nasscom unless otherwise indicated. All rights reserved.
Content on the site is for personal use only and may be downloaded provided the material is kept intact and there is no violation of the copyrights, trademarks, and other proprietary rights. Any alteration of the material or use of the material contained in the site for any other purpose is a violation of the copyright of nasscom and / or its affiliates or associates or of its third-party information providers. This material cannot be copied, reproduced, republished, uploaded, posted, transmitted or distributed in any way for non-personal use without obtaining the prior permission from nasscom.
The nasscom Members login is for the reference of only registered nasscom Member Companies.
nasscom reserves the right to modify the terms of use of any service without any liability. nasscom reserves the right to take all measures necessary to prevent access to any service or termination of service if the terms of use are not complied with or are contravened or there is any violation of copyright, trademark or other proprietary right.
From time to time nasscom may supplement these terms of use with additional terms pertaining to specific content (additional terms). Such additional terms are hereby incorporated by reference into these Terms of Use.

Disclaimer

The Company information provided on the nasscom web site is as per data collected by companies. nasscom is not liable on the authenticity of such data.
nasscom has exercised due diligence in checking the correctness and authenticity of the information contained in the site, but nasscom or any of its affiliates or associates or employees shall not be in any way responsible for any loss or damage that may arise to any person from any inadvertent error in the information contained in this site. The information from or through this site is provided "as is" and all warranties express or implied of any kind, regarding any matter pertaining to any service or channel, including without limitation the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and non-infringement are disclaimed. nasscom and its affiliates and associates shall not be liable, at any time, for any failure of performance, error, omission, interruption, deletion, defect, delay in operation or transmission, computer virus, communications line failure, theft or destruction or unauthorised access to, alteration of, or use of information contained on the site. No representations, warranties or guarantees whatsoever are made as to the accuracy, adequacy, reliability, completeness, suitability or applicability of the information to a particular situation.
nasscom or its affiliates or associates or its employees do not provide any judgments or warranty in respect of the authenticity or correctness of the content of other services or sites to which links are provided. A link to another service or site is not an endorsement of any products or services on such site or the site.
The content provided is for information purposes alone and does not substitute for specific advice whether investment, legal, taxation or otherwise. nasscom disclaims all liability for damages caused by use of content on the site.
All responsibility and liability for any damages caused by downloading of any data is disclaimed.
nasscom reserves the right to modify, suspend / cancel, or discontinue any or all sections, or service at any time without notice.

For any grievances under the Information Technology Act 2000, please get in touch with Grievance Officer, Mr. Anirban Mandal at data-query@nasscom.in.

New

See all

No notification found.

Here’s why C-Level Executives Should Stay Away From These 6 Cybersecurity Myths, says Priya Kanduri, VP, CTO, IMSS

HappiestMinds Technologies

@happiest_minds

May 19, 2020

Data Science & AI Community

1262

The C-suite in any organisation is entrusted with the responsibility of spearheading innovation, progress, and company direction. Additionally, C-level executives hold a greater responsibility in maintaining the security of their network. Hackers believe senior executives are the weakest link in an enterprise network, often falling prey to fraud and phishing scams.

In the current digitally advanced era, it is imperative for senior executives to develop a solid foundation of security realities to ensure the organisation is prepared to detect and defend cyber threats at all times. However, certain myths around cybersecurity that c-level executives should consider seriously, which could prevent them from safeguarding the enterprise effectively.

Here are six such myths and healthy workarounds that can help decision-makers defy them.

Myth 1: Security defences don’t have to be very expensive

A CEO and Board Risk Management Survey by Deloitte highlighted that 95% of CEOs believe their enterprises will face severe threats and disruptions to their growth prospects in the next couple of years — with disruptive technologies and cyber incidents being the two greatest threats. However, many leaders still utilise traditional approaches, tools, and technologies to detect and manage risks.

Investments and budgets allocated to cybersecurity are quite low when compared to the magnitude of potential damage — reputational and financial — that a cyberattack can result in. Yet, many executive-level managers are sceptical about investing in security defences. It’s time they change their mindset that higher investments in cybersecurity, which will result in more significant expenses on the balance sheet. The c-suite must realise the need for sophisticated cyber defence methodologies to counter and prevent threats. Instead of focusing the discussions on the amount spent on cybersecurity, it should revolve around utilising cybersecurity investments intelligently.

Myth 2: Security cannot and should not be outsourced

While some enterprise leaders believe security is too expensive to be outsourced, a few others feel outsourcing could result in non-compliance to state or country regulations. However, some executives feel cybersecurity is a sensitive area that has to be managed in-house. As far as regulatory compliance is concerned, data protection mandates do not prevent outsourcing. When done in a controlled manner with all underlying signed service agreements with liability clauses in place, outsourcing will not just be legal and complaint but will also offer better defence in a cost-effective way.

IT security is more affordable and flexible when entrusted to the cybersecurity experts. Choosing the right security partner is critical. Firms with expertise in niche security skills will be able to streamline processes efficiently and ensure proactive monitoring against all incoming threats. Such firms are not only successful in identifying and hiring the best cybersecurity talent but are also able to retain the recruited security experts—by motivating them with opportunities for cross-skilling, upskilling, and working across technologies and horizontals.

Myth 3: Adherence to IT and cyber regulations equals 100% fool-proof cybersecurity

Developing such a mindset is one of the most expensive mistakes that decision-makers commit. While compliance with government and industry regulations is critical in carrying out business and building trust with partners and customers — it is the bare minimum. It only means that the enterprise has checked the first box with regard to cybersecurity.

Compliance can reduce reputation damage to a certain extent when entangled in a legal cyberattack battle, but it does not promise adequate security. A robust incident response plan is required to avoid the attack itself. Defining the right strategy to protect an organisation’s high-value assets is the responsibility of the leadership team over and above regulatory compliance responsibilities.

Myth 4: Controls? Implemented. Patches? Up-to-date. Hence, my organisation is completely safe

CEOs need to understand that controls implemented once do not protect an enterprise forever. They need constant auditing, reviewing, refreshing, and upgrading, to be protected from various threat vectors. In today’s digitally advanced era, an enterprise network is loaded with a plethora of applications, firewalls, routers, servers and connected devices. Keeping every single component in this network patched and up to date is a massive, extremely critical task. Hence, relaxing post executing basic controls and patches, and assuming that the enterprise is safe, is going to cost the enterprise dearly.

Permanent satisfaction is never a reality with regard to cybersecurity. Leaders need to understand the importance of keeping up with the trends of cyber defence. They should continuously monitor, audit, implement and embed security operations as part of the enterprise’s proactive defence strategy. Cybersecurity should become an essential element of board-level agenda.

Myth 5: Awareness programs are sufficient for employees to fight and prevent cyber threats

As threats and defences change constantly, lack of a structured approach toward tackling these threats could disrupt businesses to an unimaginable extent. Once-in-a-lifetime or annual cybersecurity training and awareness programs are not going to be enough anymore. Imagine the magnitude of damage that can be caused when an employee accidentally opens a malicious link in a phishing email, or uploads a client document to a public folder, or shares critical code with the wrong person. Today, social engineering attacks are one of the most popular ways to attack organisations in the cyberspace, and such incidents can be avoided through regular cybersecurity awareness campaigns and phishing simulations.

Organisations with security-aware employees tend to be better poised to prevent and counter cyber threats. Regularly educating employees on the do’s and don’ts associated with cybersecurity—via e-mail campaigns, communication campaigns, employee awareness programs, specialised training programs for IT teams, etc.—gets employees to think twice before unintentionally putting data into the wrong hands.

Myth 6: My enterprise’s current insurance policy covers cyber insurance

71% of 105 CFOs surveyed by FM Global felt that they were adequately covered in the event of a cybersecurity incident, and 26% expected the cyber insurance provider to cover their losses in full. Assuming cyber insurance is included in the firm’s existing insurance policy is a common mistake. Most traditional commercial general liability policies do not cover cyber risks such as data breach response, liability and privacy fines. While signing up for insurance policies, decision-makers need to be fully aware of the extent of coverage. The firm’s current insurance policy may not cover fines to regulatory bodies or financial losses due to attacks.

Cybersecurity insurance needs to be chosen after careful evaluation—identifying the possible levels of threat; identifying different types of penalty that could be applicable in case of an issue, and understanding if the cost that will be covered in the cyber insurance policy. It is crucial to opt for a cyber insurance policy that will include a reasonable level of damage in case of an attack.

Read More on the Way Forward for Cyber Security: https://www.happiestminds.com/news-and-events/news/#c-level-executives-stay-away-6-cybersecurity-myths

*Originally Published on Analytics India Mag

For more such blogs, follow us on: https://www.happiestminds.com/blogs

CyberSecurity cyberattacks cybersecuritymyths cyberthreats cyberinsurance

Disclaimer

That the contents of third-party articles/blogs published here on the website, and the interpretation of all information in the article/blogs such as data, maps, numbers, opinions etc. displayed in the article/blogs and views or the opinions expressed within the content are solely of the author's; and do not reflect the opinions and beliefs of NASSCOM or its affiliates in any manner. NASSCOM does not take any liability w.r.t. content in any manner and will not be liable in any manner whatsoever for any kind of liability arising out of any act, error or omission. The contents of third-party article/blogs published, are provided solely as convenience; and the presence of these articles/blogs should not, under any circumstances, be considered as an endorsement of the contents by NASSCOM in any manner; and if you chose to access these articles/blogs , you do so at your own risk.

HappiestMinds Technologies

Happiest Minds Technologies

Key Trends in Gen AI Startups: Pivo...

Madhumay

Digital Transfo..

15 Nov 2024

Power of Machine Learning via Data ...

Snowflake

Machine Learnin..

15 Nov 2024