Topics In Demand
Notification
New

No notification found.

Blog
Microservices Availability: Microservices Architecture Resilient Against Failures

May 29, 2020

833

0

One of the biggest concerns with distributed systems is fault tolerance. A lot of development as well as testing time is spent over exception handling and regression. Microservices Architecture is essential for failure handling in the times when application complexity is on rage. So, how exactly does microservices based systems handle failure? What are the principles that guide it? Most importantly, what measure do the organizations need to take so that these principles are practically met for a  scaling customer base.  Let us have a look.

 

A Resilient Architecture

Resilience is a key governing principle of the microservice architecture. In general terms, it states that the microservice, at any time, should be available for function even if there’s a failure. Practically, this is achieved by restarting the replica of the failed microservices on another machine, hence maintaining the availability undisturbed. Furthermore, the state of the failed microservice is saved to be retrieved later. Therefore, resiliency and availability ensure data consistency and fail-fast mechanism. However, with the increasing complexity of the applications, the availability of microservices might face some challenges like the applications upgrade, for instance. Here the dilemma for the deploying microservices is whether to upgrade to a newer version or roll back to an older one. There need to be enough machines for the app to run uninterrupted during the update. Additionally, a constant monitoring of microservices health is required to make timely decisions in this regard. 

Here are some tips to maintain the resilience and availability of microservices for a fail-proof architecture:

 

    • Proactive Diagnostics: The frontline fighters have to microservices themselves. Regular health insights sent by them can help with proactive diagnosis. A standardized logging format can help teams to understand the behavioral patterns of the microservices and take decisions over allocating the resources to deal with possible failure. Consistency in this approach can minimize the failure risks for the application.

 

  • Regular Monitoring: While proactive diagnosis is helpful to understand the functional patterns of the microservices, a regular monitoring of the current state is also necessary. This will help the teams to immediately take actions, should the proactive diagnosis fail to predict the current state of the microservices..  Health is different from diagnostics.Moreover, regular monitoring also ensures better availability of microservices especially during the times of app upgrades. Libraries can be included to streamline the monitoring and reporting process. These libraries automatically keep tabs on whether the microservices is alive and ready to function.

 

 

  • Managing the health data: Each microservices is meant to deal with a specific domain of the application. This means that, the more complex your application is, the more essential it is to properly manage the diagnostic data and monitoring reports. A microservices architecture is meant to deal with the complexity of the application. However, the complexity of the architecture itself might need some handling of its own. The multiple instances of a microservice that are needed for resilience and availability during unforeseen failures need to be consistently monitored. It is necessary for the team working on specific domains to properly manage the health and diagnosis data to ensure the stability of the overall system.

Conclusion

The robustness of the microservices architecture is also a result of its resilience and availability. As the customers scale for the organizations, mere multiplication of microservice instances won’t work. There need to be provisions in place to deal with the unpredicted failures. A little proactiveness and experience on the part of the organization can help their applications to fully enjoy the benefits of this architecture while also avoiding certain pitfalls.


That the contents of third-party articles/blogs published here on the website, and the interpretation of all information in the article/blogs such as data, maps, numbers, opinions etc. displayed in the article/blogs and views or the opinions expressed within the content are solely of the author's; and do not reflect the opinions and beliefs of NASSCOM or its affiliates in any manner. NASSCOM does not take any liability w.r.t. content in any manner and will not be liable in any manner whatsoever for any kind of liability arising out of any act, error or omission. The contents of third-party article/blogs published, are provided solely as convenience; and the presence of these articles/blogs should not, under any circumstances, be considered as an endorsement of the contents by NASSCOM in any manner; and if you chose to access these articles/blogs , you do so at your own risk.


We started with the belief that business problems can be solved with intelligent, modern technology intervention. Since our inception, we have continuously evolved, experimented and innovated by testing the limits of the ingenuity that technology can enable. Building great products is intertwined in the roots of our organization and part of our DNA. Our journey has been of continuous learning and progression. Starting with Mobile and Cloud, User Experience, Data analytics BigData and IoT integrated solutions, to scalable web solutions governed by DevOps platforms and based on Microservices & Microfrontend architectures. Rather than sticking to single technology, we have always had the vision to adapt, master and embrace new-age technologies, tools and frameworks.

© Copyright nasscom. All Rights Reserved.