Topics In Demand
Notification
New

No notification found.

Blog
GST: Submission on denial of GST refunds on account of treatment of overseas group entity as ‘establishment of distinct person’

July 20, 2020

2108

0


Listen to this article



Issue: 

In order to qualify as ‘export of service’ under Section 2(6) of Integrated Goods & Services tax Act, 2017 (IGST Act), one of the conditions is that “the supplier of service and the recipient of service are not merely establishments of a distinct person in accordance with Explanation 1 in section 8.” Further, Explanation 1 to Section 8 of the IGST Act, states that “where a person has an establishment in India and any other establishment outside India, then such establishments shall be treated as establishments of distinct persons”.

In this regard, Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) had, vide issue of FAQs (3rd Edition) dated 15 December 2018, clarified that “if the Indian arm is set up as a wholly owned Indian subsidiary company incorporated under the Indian laws, the foreign company and the Indian subsidiary would not be governed by the provisions of distinct person or related person as both are separate legal entities”. Therefore, where the service provider and the service recipient are separate legal entities incorporated under the laws of respective countries, the entities would not be construed as mere establishments of a distinct person.

However, based on feedback from industry while dealing with field officers, it has been highlighted that the jurisdictional State GST officers are rejecting refund claims of the exporters on the ground that the services are provided to foreign group companies, treating them as ‘establishments of the same entity’ and therefore, does not constitute ‘export’ under GST law. As a result, taxpayers are facing hardships due to such erroneous view which requires immediate clarification.

In light of the above, we have made a representation to GST Policy Wing requesting the government to issue appropriate instructions to field officer directing that in case of provision of services by a service provider in India to a service recipient outside India where both the parties are separate legal entities, such service provider and service recipient will not be treated as ‘establishments of distinct persons’. Accordingly, export position should not be denied for such services rendered between the said entities.

We will keep you posted on further developments in this regard.


That the contents of third-party articles/blogs published here on the website, and the interpretation of all information in the article/blogs such as data, maps, numbers, opinions etc. displayed in the article/blogs and views or the opinions expressed within the content are solely of the author's; and do not reflect the opinions and beliefs of NASSCOM or its affiliates in any manner. NASSCOM does not take any liability w.r.t. content in any manner and will not be liable in any manner whatsoever for any kind of liability arising out of any act, error or omission. The contents of third-party article/blogs published, are provided solely as convenience; and the presence of these articles/blogs should not, under any circumstances, be considered as an endorsement of the contents by NASSCOM in any manner; and if you chose to access these articles/blogs , you do so at your own risk.


Tejasvi

© Copyright nasscom. All Rights Reserved.