Topics In Demand
Notification
New

No notification found.

Global Data Protection Dialogues: Key Takeaways for India’s Industry and Policymakers
Global Data Protection Dialogues: Key Takeaways for India’s Industry and Policymakers

54

0

In April and May 2025, I participated in two pivotal global events on personal data protection—the IAPP Global Privacy Summit in Washington DC (23–24 April) and the Global CBPR Workshop in Singapore (26–28 May).

Below is a summary of insights for Indian industry and government, as we implement the Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDPA) and step up on digital trade. My presentation at the CBPR Workshop is attached.

IAPP Global Privacy Summit 2025 (Washington DC, 23–24 April)

The Summit brought together dataprotection practitioners, regulators, policymakers, trade bodies and think-tanks. Outside of the summit, I had useful meetings with US government officials, industry associations and global think tanks.

Top Insights on India’s DPDPA

  • Balanced Approach Recognised:
    – Many delegates view the DPDPA as reasonably well balanced between individual rights and business needs.
    – However, they await final Rules hope for a two-year transition timeline.
  • Key Areas of Concern (due to current scope in the Act/Rules):
    1. “Legitimate Use” vs. GDPR’s “Legitimate Interest”
      – DPDPA permits processing only for the purpose explicitly stated in the consent notice and the scope of legitimate use as an alternative basis for processing is very narrow. Unlike GDPR, there is no broadly defined “legitimate interest” basis. Everyone understands that this is an issue with the Act, and the Draft Rules cannot address the same.
    2. Cross-Border Processing Restrictions
      – A new method to restrict cross border personal data transfers Significant Data Fiduciaries through a Committee process, something that was not envisaged in the Act came up as a point of concern. This was highlighted in combination with the fact that “Significant Data Fiduciaries” can be designated by Rules in an overly broad manner, potentially lumping many entities into a stricter regime. The threshold for “significant” is unclear, making compliance implications uncertain.
    3. Breach Reporting Requirements
      – The Act’s definition of “personal data breach” is quite broad; there is no explicit materiality threshold (e.g., number of records affected).
      – Companies anticipate the requirement for reporting every minor incident as being impractical, and fear this may dilute focus on genuinely severe breaches.
    4. Processing of Children’s Data
      – Under the DPDPA, anyone processing data of individuals under 18 requires verifiable parental consent for all purposes. Industry understands that under the draft Rules, the scope of the verification is envisaged to focus on establishing that the person consenting is an adult.
      – Industry is figuring out how to deal with the blanket ban on targeted advertising and behavioural monitoring of minors, regardless of parental opt-in. Exceptions are narrow (healthcare, education, safety).
      – By contrast, EU frameworks allow certain forms of adolescent profiling or marketing under strict conditions (age-appropriate design, transparency).

My Speaking Session: “Operational Implications of India’s DPDPA”

  • Panellists:
    – Monika Tomczak-Górlikowska, Chief Privacy Officer, Prosus N.V.
    – Rahul Mathan, Co-founding Partner, Trilegal (specialising in tech, media & telecom law).
  • Audience Profile:
    – Roughly 100 participants, most with substantial operations or global capability centres in India (spanning enterprise software, consumer internet, financial services).

Other Noteworthy Conversations

  • Sam Altman (OpenAI) & Alex Blania (Tools for Humanity):
    – Pitched the “World Network”—an iris-based, open-source orbital scanner for fool-proof human authentication online.
    – Underpinned by cryptography and multi-party computation (MPC), data could remain anonymised and not stored in a single database.
     In India, Aadhaar already provides biometric verification at scale. Too early to comment on the “World Network” model - adoption hinges largely on public confidence in privacy safeguards and regulators’ comfort.

 

2. Global CBPR Workshop 2025 (Singapore, 26–28 May)

Global CBPR (Cross-Border Privacy Rules):
– A voluntary, multilateral framework for interoperable data-protection certification.
– Built upon the APEC CBPR and PRP systems, now administered by the Global CBPR Forum.
– Includes CAPE (Cross-Border Privacy Enforcement) for law-enforcement cooperation.

Organiser and Participants

  • Hosted by: Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA) of Singapore (which includes the Personal Data Protection Commission, PDPC).
  • Attendees: Senior regulators, industry leaders and representatives from CBPR-member economies and India. A senior representative from MEITY, government of India, participated.

Background: CBPR in India

  • Previous Delhi Workshop (September 2024): Co-hosted by Nasscom, DSCI, MEITY and MEA to introduce Global CBPR to Indian stakeholders. (Blog here)
  • Objective: Evaluate whether CBPR (Cross-Border Privacy Rules) and PRP (Privacy Recognition for Processors) would complement India’s DPDPA and facilitate secure international data flows.

Key Updates and Insights

  • CBPR Framework Evolution:
    – Built on the APEC CBPR system, the Global CBPR forum launched in 2022.
    – New “Global CBPR” and “PRP” certifications are now live—companies can apply via recognised Accountability Agents.
  • Growing Global Interest:
    – Thailand and Nigeria have expressed intent in joining.
    – Sri Lanka and Bangladesh are actively evaluating the framework.
    – US, Japan, Australia, Singapore, Canada, S. Korea, Mexico, Philippines, Taiwan are full members and UK, Dubai IFC, Mauritius and Bermuda are associate members.
  • Progress Report:
    1. Operationalisation: Certification pathways clarified; many leading multinationals have applied.
    2. Regulatory Cooperation (CAPE): Global CAPE (Cooperation Arrangement for Privacy Enforcement) is gaining momentum. CAPE enables cross-border enforcement collaboration among Privacy Enforcement Authorities (PEAs).
    3. Complementarity with DPDPA:
      – CBPR’s baseline obligations align well with many DPDPA principles (accountability, notice, data security).
      – Participation could strengthen safeguards for cross border data processing, facilitate limited interoperability, and smoothen international data flows with our key digital trade partner nations.
  • Nasscom’s Ongoing Work:
    – An in-depth White Paper (under finalisation) will guide government, regulators and industry on CBPR/PRP/CAPE merits, examining:
    • Compatibility with DPDPA’s requirements.
    • Cost-benefit for Indian entities.
    • Law enforcement cooperation benefits (via CAPE).
    Call to Action: As the DPDPA is rolled out, Indian stakeholders should proactively evaluate CBPR/PRP/ CAPE to accelerate global interoperability.

Conclusion
The IAPP Summit and CBPR Workshop underscored the rapid evolution of global data-protection norms and reinforced the need for India to prioritise its DPDPA implementation, examine interoperability with data protection regimes with key trading partners, provide certainty on compliance obligations, all without compromising personal data protection.


That the contents of third-party articles/blogs published here on the website, and the interpretation of all information in the article/blogs such as data, maps, numbers, opinions etc. displayed in the article/blogs and views or the opinions expressed within the content are solely of the author's; and do not reflect the opinions and beliefs of NASSCOM or its affiliates in any manner. NASSCOM does not take any liability w.r.t. content in any manner and will not be liable in any manner whatsoever for any kind of liability arising out of any act, error or omission. The contents of third-party article/blogs published, are provided solely as convenience; and the presence of these articles/blogs should not, under any circumstances, be considered as an endorsement of the contents by NASSCOM in any manner; and if you chose to access these articles/blogs , you do so at your own risk.


Download Attachment

Day1_Panel2_AshishAggarwal.pdf

ashish.aggarwal

© Copyright nasscom. All Rights Reserved.