Topics In Demand
Notification
New

No notification found.

A Glimpse Into the Future: How Teams with AI Agents and Humans Will Perform
A Glimpse Into the Future: How Teams with AI Agents and Humans Will Perform

April 2, 2025

37

0

More and more evidence points to a future where humans and AI agents collaborate closely at work. These agents — autonomous software tools that remember context, use systems, and act with little oversight — are no longer just assistants. They’re becoming fully-fledged contributors to team performance.

But how does this actually play out?

A large-scale study using the MindMeld platform tested this by assigning 2,310 participants to either human-only or human-plus-AI teams. Each team worked on marketing campaign tasks involving both written and visual content. The experiment tracked communication, productivity, and quality of output.

The results were striking.

Human-AI Teams Delivered 60% More Output Per Person
Hybrid teams outperformed their human-only counterparts by 60% in terms of output per individual. What’s more, working with AI shifted how tasks got done. Humans in these teams spent 23% more time crafting content and 20% less on editing. Edits required on AI-generated copy dropped by 84%.

Communication Became More Focused and Task-Oriented
Collaborating with AI led to a 137% rise in task-related interactions. Human-AI teams sent 45% more messages, which were more structured — focusing on planning, instructions, and prioritization — rather than social chit-chat.

Humans Shifted to Higher-Value Tasks
As AI took over more executional work, human contributors stepped into roles involving strategy, ideation, and judgment — signaling a move up the value chain.

But AI’s Strengths Aren’t Uniform
While AI boosted copywriting tasks, image quality suffered. Ads with AI-written text and human-generated visuals performed best across 5 million impressions. This underlines the ongoing need for human judgment in areas requiring aesthetic or brand-sensitive decisions.

AI Personality Design Matters
The study also explored how different AI “personality traits” influenced results. Teams where conscientious humans worked with “open” AI agents — programmed to be exploratory and flexible — created better visuals. On the other hand, poorly matched traits (e.g., overly dominant or passive pairings) led to weaker outcomes.

Key Takeaways for Business Leaders:

  • Redesign workflows to reduce coordination overhead and enhance decision speed.
  • Shift human roles toward oversight, creativity, and strategy.
  • Configure AI personalities thoughtfully to complement team dynamics.

AI agents are already co-creating documents, content, and campaigns. As their role grows, designing systems that support effective human-AI collaboration becomes a strategic imperative.

Ready to explore this shift in your own team? Read the full blog post here


That the contents of third-party articles/blogs published here on the website, and the interpretation of all information in the article/blogs such as data, maps, numbers, opinions etc. displayed in the article/blogs and views or the opinions expressed within the content are solely of the author's; and do not reflect the opinions and beliefs of NASSCOM or its affiliates in any manner. NASSCOM does not take any liability w.r.t. content in any manner and will not be liable in any manner whatsoever for any kind of liability arising out of any act, error or omission. The contents of third-party article/blogs published, are provided solely as convenience; and the presence of these articles/blogs should not, under any circumstances, be considered as an endorsement of the contents by NASSCOM in any manner; and if you chose to access these articles/blogs , you do so at your own risk.


© Copyright nasscom. All Rights Reserved.