Topics In Demand
Notification
New

No notification found.

Policy Update: SEBI releases revised Framework for Regulatory Sandbox
Policy Update: SEBI releases revised Framework for Regulatory Sandbox

July 3, 2021

84

0

On June 14, 2021, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) released an updated version of the Framework for Regulatory Sandbox (RS). The major change in the policy is pertaining to the Eligibility Criteria for the RS. This has been done to enhance the reach and achieve the desired aim of the RS.

On June 5, 2020, SEBI had released the first version of this policy. Under  the RS Framework,  entities  regulated  by  SEBI  would  be  granted  certain facilities and flexibilities to experiment with FinTech solutions in a live environment and on limited set of real customers for a limited time frame.

Highlights of the Revised Framework

  1. Introduction of Sandbox Testing Stages

Sandbox testing has been divided into two stages.

In Stage-I, SEBI will approve the limited set of users as proposed by the applicant for testing. During the stage-I testing, applicant shall use limited and identified set of users with maximum cap on users based on the requirement of the applicant duly approved by SEBI on case-to-case basis. These users will be required to provide positive consent including their understanding of the risks of using the solution.

In stage-II testing, applicant shall test with larger set of identified users with maximum cap on  users  based  on  the  requirement  of  the  applicant  duly approved  by  SEBI  on  case  to  case  basis.  These users will  be  required  to  provide positive consent including their understanding of the risks of using the solution

  1. Revised Eligibility Criteria

Since two stages of RS testing have been introduced, SEBI has laid out separate eligibility criteria for each stage.

Stage-I Eligibility Criteria:

  • SEBI  Registration-The  applicant  should  be  an  entity  registered  with  SEBI  under section  12  of  the  SEBI  Act  1992.  The  entity  may  apply  either  on  its  own  or  in partnership   with   any   other   entity.   In   either   scenario,   the   registered   market participant shall be treated as the principal applicant, and shall be solely responsible for all aspects of participation in the RS.
  • Genuine need to test-The applicant should have a genuine need for live testing the solution on real users. The applicant should provide justification that testing in test environment with test data is not enough.
  • Genuine need for relaxation-The applicant should provide justification that the solution cannot be deployed without relaxations in certain regulations being sought.
  • Compliance to the objective of the Regulatory Sandbox-The solution should be pertaining to the securities market and should be either new innovative solutions or a solution for performing existing services in better way by improving the existing processes or facilitating inclusion.
  • Benefits to users-The solution should offer identifiable benefits (direct or indirect) to the users and/or to the securities market as a whole.
  • Testing readiness of the solution-The applicant should have necessary resources to support testing in the sandbox and must demonstrate well developed testing plans with clear objectives, parameters and success criteria.
  • Safeguards  to  mitigate  potential  risks  to  the  financial  system-The  solution should   have   proper   risk   management   strategy   to   incorporate   appropriate safeguards to mitigate and control potential risks to any market participants/users that  may  arise  from  the  testing  of  the  solution  and  shall  propose  appropriate safeguards to manage the risks and contain the consequences of failure.

An applicant is eligible for Stage-II after completing minimum 90 days in the Regulatory Sandbox testing.

Stage-II Eligibility Criteria:

  • Adequate Progress-The applicant  should  demonstrate  that  they  have  achieved adequate progress and are on track with their testing plan.
  • Compliance  to  the  objective  of  the  Regulatory  Sandbox-The  applicant  should provide  justification that they  are  complying  with  the  objective  of  the  RS.
  • Reviews  of  the  Risks  observed  during  Stage-I  testing-The  applicant  should submit the details of the risks observed during stage-I testing along  with the steps taken to mitigate those risks.
  • Safeguards  to  mitigate  potential  risks-The  applicant  should  provide  the  list  of appropriate safeguards to manage the risks and contain the consequences of failure.
  • Users  feedback-The  applicant  should  present  summary  of  the  feedback  received from  the users participated  during  stage-I  of  the   Regulatory  Sandbox  testing highlighting the adverse feedbacks and steps taken to address the same.
  • Deployment post-testing-The applicant should present the intention and ability to deploy  the  solution  on  a  broader  scale.  To this  effect  the  applicant  should  share  a proposed sandbox exit strategy
  1. Revised Application and Approval Process

SEBI has added some new clauses to the Application and Approval Process laid out in the initial framework. The new clauses include:

  • SEBI shall communicate  with  the  applicant during the  course  of  evaluating the sandbox application, and during the testing phase. The status of the applications shall be published on SEBI website.
  •  If the applicant is able and willing to meet the proposed regulatory requirements and conditions, the applicant shall be accepted in Stage-I and granted permission to develop and test the proposed Innovativesolution(s) in the sandbox.
  • Upon approval, the applicant shall apply for the limited certificate of registration of that particular category of intermediary for which the applicant seeks to test the innovative solution along with a token fees of Rs 10,000.
  • Once registration is allotted to the applicant, the application shall proceed towards the “Stage-I Testing Stage”. The applicant shall disclose to its users  that  the  solution shall operate in  a  sandbox  and  the potential key  risks  associated  with  the solution.  The applicant is also required to obtain the users’ positive consent that they have read and understood the risks before any transactions separately for both Stage-I and Stage-II.
  • An  applicant  is eligible  for  Stage-II  after  completing  minimum  three  months  in  the Regulatory Sandbox testing.
  • If approved, applicant enters stage-II of Sandbox testing: Applicant shall be able to test on  users with  maximum  cap  on  users  based  on  the  requirement  of  the  applicant  duly approved  by  SEBI.  These  users  will  be  required  to  provide  positive  consent  including their understanding of the risks of using the solution.
  • The applicant must submit monthly reports as mentioned in the Section: “SUBMISSIONOF TEST RELATED INFORMATION AND REPORTS”. These monthly reports would be reviewed  by  SEBI.  If  the  progress  of  the  applicant  is  not  satisfactory  then,  SEBI  may revoke the approval to participate in the sandbox.
  1. Different Evaluation Criteria for both stages

Different evaluation criteria have been introduced for both the stages of the RS.

STAGE-I Evaluation Criteria:

  • Profile of the applicant
  • Genuine need to test
  • Genuine need for relaxation
  • Solution should be either new solution or improvement in the existing processes
  • Identified  benefits  to  the users and/or  the  securities/commodities markets
  • Compilation   of   meaningful   test scenarios   and   expected/desired outcomes
  • Risk  measured/graded  testing  conditions  and  parameters  so  as  to ensure safety and protection of the markets/users
  • Risk mitigation for high risk testing conditions and parameters
  • Appropriate disclosure requirements and protection to their users
  • Clearly defined grievance redressal mechanism and user rights
  • Adequate disclosure of the potential risks to participating users
  • Prior confirmation from users that they fully understand and accept the attendant risks
  • Intent and feasibility to deploy the proposed innovative solution post testing
  • The  withdrawal  strategy  (in  the  event  the  tests  are  not  successful) including for participating users
  • Any other factors considered relevant by SEBI

STAGE-II Evaluation Criteria

  • Applicant has achieved adequate progress in stage –I testing
  • Review of the risks observed during stage –I testing
  • Review of the steps taken to mitigate the risks
  • Appropriate    safeguards    to    manage    the    risks    and    contain    the consequences of failure
  • User feedback during  stage-I testing
  • Intent and feasibility to deploy the proposed Innovative solution post testing
  • The deployment and monitoring strategy post testing (in the event the tests are deemed successful) or the withdrawal strategy including for participating users (in the event the tests are not successful)
  1. Introduced Withdrawal Strategy

The Revised Framework includes Withdrawal Strategy from RS. Such a strategy was not present in the last version of the Framework. The applicant  shall  provide  withdrawal  strategy  which shall be applicable in the event the tests are not successful or applicant wants to discontinue  the  sandbox  testing  or  SEBI  revokes  the  approval  to  participate  in the sandbox as per the” Revocation of the Approval” clause of this document.

The withdrawal strategy shall include following:

  • Process of notification to the existing users regarding the termination of the  sandbox  testing  and  informing  them on  the  necessary  steps  to  be taken.
  • Settling/ transferring etc. of the current position of the existing  users within  15  days  of  the  initiation  of  the  withdrawal  strategy,  as  may  be applicable.
  • Refund of any dues to the existing users within 15 days of the initiation of the withdrawal strategy.

Read the Revised RS Framework here.

Read the last version of RS Framework here.

 


That the contents of third-party articles/blogs published here on the website, and the interpretation of all information in the article/blogs such as data, maps, numbers, opinions etc. displayed in the article/blogs and views or the opinions expressed within the content are solely of the author's; and do not reflect the opinions and beliefs of NASSCOM or its affiliates in any manner. NASSCOM does not take any liability w.r.t. content in any manner and will not be liable in any manner whatsoever for any kind of liability arising out of any act, error or omission. The contents of third-party article/blogs published, are provided solely as convenience; and the presence of these articles/blogs should not, under any circumstances, be considered as an endorsement of the contents by NASSCOM in any manner; and if you chose to access these articles/blogs , you do so at your own risk.


images
Komal Gupta
Policy Analyst

Policy Professional| Former Tech and Business Journalist|

© Copyright nasscom. All Rights Reserved.