Topics In Demand
Notification
New

No notification found.

Feedback on TRAI CP on Regulatory Mechanism for OTT Communication Services & Selective Banning of OTTs
Feedback on TRAI CP on Regulatory Mechanism for OTT Communication Services & Selective Banning of OTTs

October 3, 2023

99

0

Nasscom submitted feedback on the recent Consultation Paper titled “Regulatory Mechanism for Over-The-Top (OTT) Communication Services, and Selective Banning of OTT Services”. The premise of the CP, is the back reference from the Department of Telecommunications (DOT) in 2022 where DOT had requested TRAI to:

 1. Reconsider the ‘Recommendations on Regulatory Framework for Over-The-Top (OTT) Communications Services’ of 2020 (2020 Recommendations); and

2. Suggest a suitable regulatory mechanism for OTTs, including the issues relating to ‘selective banning of OTT services’ based on the 26th report of the Parliament’s Standing Committee on Communication and Information Technology on ‘Suspension of Telecom Services/ Internet and its impact’ of December 2021.

Follow are our main recommendations to TRAI. For detailed recommendations, please see the attachment. 

  1. Disproportionate regulatory burden should not be imposed on OTTs as it can impede the virtuous cycle OTTs have contributed to in the data economy. Further, this can hamper consumer’s right to choose, raise cost of service, create entry barriers and scuttle innovation in the OTT market. The government should explore options to reduce some of the regulatory burden on the heavily regulated TSPs under the licensing framework. This would promote ease of doing business and the data economy of the country.
  1. A market driven and organic collaborative framework already exists in India between TSPs and OTTs. Any regulatory framework/intervention for revenue sharing model like network usage fee between TSPs and OTTs should be avoided as it could violate the principles of net-neutrality, distort competition and can negatively impact the diversity of products, prices, and performance.
  1. Attempting to contain all OTT services, digital services, and apps in a single definition cannot account for technological changes & will be too broad for any regulatory purpose.  Therefore, ‘OTT services’ should not be defined.
  1. OTT application can have multiple functionalities that are inextricably interlinked. Any attempt to delineate any of these features would be artificial and could lead to market fragmentation.  Thus, there is no need for any classification of OTT services.
  1. Certain obligations (as listed by TRAI in the consultation paper) vis-à-vis OTT providers are applicable only to telecom service providers (TSPs) because only TSPs own exclusive rights to use public assets like – spectrum, numbering resources, right of way and critical infrastructure. Whereas OTTs merely operate on the network layer of TSPs, and they are both technologically and functionally different from TSPs. Hence, the said comparison of obligations is not merited.
  1. OTTs are regulated in the country under various laws – for example, Information Technology Act, 2000 (IT Act) and the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (DPDPA), Competition Act, 2002and the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

ISSUES RELATED TO SELECTIVE BANNING OF OTT SERVICES

  1. Selective blocking of OTT services at the application-level (by OTT service provider or TSPs) does not appear to be practicable nor technically feasible.
  1. The IT Act & Rules already contain comprehensive provisions to address security concerns, including blocking of information in emergency situations. The recently legislated DPDPA has provisions of blocking in the interests of public. There does not appear to be a case of additional regulatory framework for selective banning of OTT services under the current framework or any future law.
  2. Selective banning of OTT services or platforms even for a specific period is likely to be counterproductive for consumers, small and medium scale business both in urban and rural sector who are dependent on these OTT services.

For further details on the above feedback, please write to sudipto@nasscom.in and vertika@nasscom.in with a copy to policy@nasscom.in.


That the contents of third-party articles/blogs published here on the website, and the interpretation of all information in the article/blogs such as data, maps, numbers, opinions etc. displayed in the article/blogs and views or the opinions expressed within the content are solely of the author's; and do not reflect the opinions and beliefs of NASSCOM or its affiliates in any manner. NASSCOM does not take any liability w.r.t. content in any manner and will not be liable in any manner whatsoever for any kind of liability arising out of any act, error or omission. The contents of third-party article/blogs published, are provided solely as convenience; and the presence of these articles/blogs should not, under any circumstances, be considered as an endorsement of the contents by NASSCOM in any manner; and if you chose to access these articles/blogs , you do so at your own risk.


Download Attachment

20230901_nasscom_feedback_TRAI_OTTpaper_0.pdf

© Copyright nasscom. All Rights Reserved.