Topics In Demand
Notification
New

No notification found.

Performance Metrics @ Shared Services, GBSs & GCCs
Performance Metrics @ Shared Services, GBSs & GCCs

April 30, 2025

16

0

‘Moving beyond cost arbitrage and delivering value adds’ has often been used as a preface in every kind of discussion about GICs/shared services industry, but surely there exists a certain ambiguity around the term, Value.

More often than not, it’s construed as an indication of cost optimization efforts and rarely does correspond to actual positive impact in productivity or superior customer service.

The performance dashboards presented at board meetings depict presumed value-adds which the GIC organizations interpret as a sign of satisfactory and agreeable service. However, it may not be necessarily relevant to what the executive board cares about.

Nevertheless, there seems a marked difference between the perception of Home-Office teams (HQ/customers) and of GIC teams on various aspects of Value.

Key Performance Metrics (KPIs):

For years, GICs have been using traditional metrics like SLAs, OLAs & other organization-specific KPIs to showcase its performance.

Mid-level management teams are required to spend a significant amount of time and effort in defining the metrics, tracking the performance against set expectations, and projecting it to appropriate stakeholder groups.

Even though it symbolizes a well-intended approach and honest efforts, the meticulously articulated metrics may not be at all applicable to the business priorities. Inadvertently, the 80-20 rule seems to apply here as well, wherein the delivery teams think they have met 80% of the success criteria while the customers or stakeholders may only see 20% of the benefits case realized in their larger scheme of things. Perhaps, this could be one of the reasons for Offshore GICs to receive low NPS ratings.

Most of the metrics should ideally be linked to executive goals or overall enterprise priorities. However, not every level of staff has an equal understanding of how it translates into creating value, resulting in a lack of motivation to refine an existing set of metrics.

The roots for this approach sometimes lie in the past experiences of the managers, maybe someplace in the outsourcing industry where the billing for services is directly proportional to the time spent by an FTE on a particular activity.

That’s where the need arises to spread GIC education amongst all staff, particularly about its operating models. When a team member is asked to pull out a specific report, he/she needs to recognize how those reporting figures and data could impact multiple organization layers and how it helps other related teams to achieve wider organizational goals.

Opportunity for Service Differentiation

GICs frequently get feedback to align its operations in a way to generate more scope and maximize customer trust. Here, GICs have an opportunity to distinguish themselves against third-party service providers firms by being clear as crystal and transparent about disclosing its FTE time/effort’s calculation.

What needs to be changed?

The conventional metrics that are being used at GICs today, don’t always show any corresponding business outcome. Moreover, with an increased level of expectations from parent firms – Going forward, inadequate depiction via old-school reports and balanced scorecards won’t be enough to preserve GICs unique value for the parent enterprise. Instead, identifying and projecting direct business impact would enable GICs to find a place of mention in the enterprise’s balance sheet; as a step to move forward.

Showcase real impact with innovative approach towards metrics

  • Stop focusing on bygone parameters like cost savings (given that, very much existence of the GIC is based on cost arbitrage)
  • Identify the right audience within stakeholders and customer units for unveiling applicable business benefits
  • The reporting methods and techniques should be engaging enough for the stakeholders rather than just offering another view of periodic templates with updated data points.
  • Model the reports in a way with predictive cursors to suggest future trends
  • Create visibility for each individual process and how it results in achieving some form of business outcome
  • Emphasis on establishing a connection between 100% process compliance to delivering tangible business value
  • Extract business intelligence from metrics reported in the past and perform data analysis to generate meaningful insights for the audience

Portraying performance in a meaningful way could offer a remarkable prospect for GICs to demonstrate its worth and continue safeguarding its value proposition for the parent enterprise.

" "

 

 

 


That the contents of third-party articles/blogs published here on the website, and the interpretation of all information in the article/blogs such as data, maps, numbers, opinions etc. displayed in the article/blogs and views or the opinions expressed within the content are solely of the author's; and do not reflect the opinions and beliefs of NASSCOM or its affiliates in any manner. NASSCOM does not take any liability w.r.t. content in any manner and will not be liable in any manner whatsoever for any kind of liability arising out of any act, error or omission. The contents of third-party article/blogs published, are provided solely as convenience; and the presence of these articles/blogs should not, under any circumstances, be considered as an endorsement of the contents by NASSCOM in any manner; and if you chose to access these articles/blogs , you do so at your own risk.


© Copyright nasscom. All Rights Reserved.