Call for Inputs & Nasscom’s Submission on Draft e-Commerce Guidelines

Terms of use

Terms of Use

The use of this site and the content contained therein is governed by the Terms of Use. When you use this site you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Use and that you accept and will be bound by the terms hereof and such terms as may be modified from time to time.

All text, graphics, audio, design and other works on the site are the copyrighted works of nasscom unless otherwise indicated. All rights reserved.
Content on the site is for personal use only and may be downloaded provided the material is kept intact and there is no violation of the copyrights, trademarks, and other proprietary rights. Any alteration of the material or use of the material contained in the site for any other purpose is a violation of the copyright of nasscom and / or its affiliates or associates or of its third-party information providers. This material cannot be copied, reproduced, republished, uploaded, posted, transmitted or distributed in any way for non-personal use without obtaining the prior permission from nasscom.
The nasscom Members login is for the reference of only registered nasscom Member Companies.
nasscom reserves the right to modify the terms of use of any service without any liability. nasscom reserves the right to take all measures necessary to prevent access to any service or termination of service if the terms of use are not complied with or are contravened or there is any violation of copyright, trademark or other proprietary right.
From time to time nasscom may supplement these terms of use with additional terms pertaining to specific content (additional terms). Such additional terms are hereby incorporated by reference into these Terms of Use.

Disclaimer

The Company information provided on the nasscom web site is as per data collected by companies. nasscom is not liable on the authenticity of such data.
nasscom has exercised due diligence in checking the correctness and authenticity of the information contained in the site, but nasscom or any of its affiliates or associates or employees shall not be in any way responsible for any loss or damage that may arise to any person from any inadvertent error in the information contained in this site. The information from or through this site is provided "as is" and all warranties express or implied of any kind, regarding any matter pertaining to any service or channel, including without limitation the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and non-infringement are disclaimed. nasscom and its affiliates and associates shall not be liable, at any time, for any failure of performance, error, omission, interruption, deletion, defect, delay in operation or transmission, computer virus, communications line failure, theft or destruction or unauthorised access to, alteration of, or use of information contained on the site. No representations, warranties or guarantees whatsoever are made as to the accuracy, adequacy, reliability, completeness, suitability or applicability of the information to a particular situation.
nasscom or its affiliates or associates or its employees do not provide any judgments or warranty in respect of the authenticity or correctness of the content of other services or sites to which links are provided. A link to another service or site is not an endorsement of any products or services on such site or the site.
The content provided is for information purposes alone and does not substitute for specific advice whether investment, legal, taxation or otherwise. nasscom disclaims all liability for damages caused by use of content on the site.
All responsibility and liability for any damages caused by downloading of any data is disclaimed.
nasscom reserves the right to modify, suspend / cancel, or discontinue any or all sections, or service at any time without notice.

For any grievances under the Information Technology Act 2000, please get in touch with Grievance Officer, Mr. Anirban Mandal at data-query@nasscom.in.

New

See all

No notification found.

Call for Inputs & Nasscom’s Submission on Draft e-Commerce Guidelines

Devika Agarwal

@DevikaAgarwal

September 20, 2019

Public Policy

511

[This blog has been co-authored with Komal Gupta and Indrajeet Sircar]

Recently, Nasscom submitted its inputs to Department of Consumer Affairs on the draft e-Commerce Guidelines for Consumer Protection 2019 (‘draft Guidelines’). The original deadline (16^th September) for submitting comments on the draft Guidelines has now been extended to 31^st October, 2019.

While the draft Guidelines are aimed at stronger consumer protection measures in e-Commerce, an extensive analysis of the draft Guidelines reveals some problematic issues.

The draft Guidelines do not appear to be on sound legal basis

The draft Guidelines do not specify the provision in the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (‘1986 Act’) or the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (‘2019 Act’) under which they have been passed, or any legislative provision which empowers the Central Government to pass the draft Guidelines. To preclude any challenge to the vires of the draft Guidelines, we recommend that the draft Guidelines be enacted as Model Rules under sections 94 & 102 (1) of the 2019 Act.

Definition of e-Commerce entity needs a sharper focus (draft Guideline 2(1)(c))

An e-Commerce entity is defined ambiguously to the extent that the definition of an e-Commerce entity expressly refers to ‘electronic service providers’. We have recommended that electronic service providers should not be expressly covered under the definition of e-Commerce entity in the draft Guidelines, and suggested modifications to draft Guideline 2(1)(c) so that the draft Guidelines apply to only those entities which are conducting e-Commerce business.

Requirement of local registration requirement for e-Commerce entities (draft Guideline 3(a)(i)) is inconsistent with the definition of e-Commerce entity and is likely to be onerous

We have recommended deletion of the requirement that an e-Commerce entity carrying out e-Commerce business in India “shall be a registered legal entity under the laws of India”. This is for the reason that the definition of an e-Commerce entity already includes a foreign company or an office, branch or agency in India which is owned or controlled by a person resident outside India.

The requirement to display complete seller details on the e-Commerce entity’s website needs to be context based (draft Guideline 3(a)(vi))

We have recommended whittling down of the requirement to publish complete seller details (including identity of their business, legal name, principal geographic address, name of website, email address, contact details, including clarification of their business entity, the products they sell and how they can be contacted by customers) in draft Guideline 3(a)(vi). We believe that requiring all these details to be published by the e-Commerce entity may pose risk to the business model of e-Commerce entities and prevent them from guaranteeing a seamless shopping experience to consumers. Therefore, we have recommended that at the product listing stage, the e-Commerce entity should only be required to publish the legal name of the seller, name of website and the email address.

Prohibition on e-Commerce entities against directly or indirectly influencing the price of goods or services should be limited to the marketplace e-Commerce entities (draft Guideline 4(i))

The prohibition against directly or indirectly influencing the price of goods or services interferes with the freedom of inventory-based e-Commerce entities to carry on their business and undermines their fundamental business models, based on offering discounts. Therefore, we have recommended that the prohibition against directly or indirectly influencing the price of goods or services should only be applicable to marketplace e-Commerce entities.

The rationale for the obligation on e-Commerce entities to display terms of contract between e-Commerce entity and the seller is not clear (draft Guideline 4(i))

The reasons for publicly displaying the contractual terms between the seller and the e-commerce entities are not clear, given that these terms do not concern the customers and there is no privity of contract with the customer.

We recommend that instead of an e-commerce entity being mandated to disclose terms with the seller, the e-Commerce entity should be required to display the customer facing and governing policies of return, refund, exchange, warranty / guarantee, delivery / shipment, mode of payments, grievance redressal mechanism etc. This will ensure that the consumer interest is adequately protected.

Responsibility for delisting counterfeit goods needs to be defined keeping in view the obligations expected from an intermediary (draft Guideline 4(ix))

The draft Guideline 4(ix) imposes obligation on an e-Commerce entity to delist counterfeit goods on its platform on being informed about the counterfeit product “by the consumer” or if it “comes to know by itself or through another source”. Further, after delisting the counterfeit product, the e-Commerce entity “must notify the consumers of the same”.

We have recommended that the phrase, “comes to know by itself or through another source”, should be deleted. According to the decision of the Supreme Court in Shreya Singhal, actual knowledge of unlawful content by an intermediary could only be formed on the basis of a court or government (executive) order. As an e-Commerce entity may also be an ‘intermediary’ under section 79 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (‘IT Act’), it is recommended that knowledge on the part of an e-Commerce entity under the Model Rules should have the same meaning as knowledge under the intermediary guidelines, in order to harmonise the obligations of an e-Commerce entity under both the Model Rules and the IT Act and the rules made thereunder. Further, the requirement to inform consumers about delisted counterfeit products should only extend to the complainant consumers and those consumers whose orders have not been fulfilled as on the date of obtaining such knowledge.

Contributory or secondary liability of an e-Commerce entity should be linked to its claims on assurance or guarantee regarding authenticity of goods sold on its platform (draft Guideline 4(x))

We have recommended that the contributory or secondary liability of an e-Commerce entity with respect to authenticity of goods sold on its platform should arise only where the e-Commerce entity has expressly vouched for or guaranteed that goods sold on its platform are authentic.

The attachment below contains our complete submission to Department of Consumer Affairs. As the date for submitting comments has been extended to 31^st October, 2019 we request members to send any additional inputs to Nasscom at the following email IDs by 20^th October, 2019:

indrajeet@nasscom.in

komal@nasscom.in

dagarwal@nasscom.in

consumer protection e-commerce guidelines Department of Consumer Affairs

Disclaimer

That the contents of third-party articles/blogs published here on the website, and the interpretation of all information in the article/blogs such as data, maps, numbers, opinions etc. displayed in the article/blogs and views or the opinions expressed within the content are solely of the author's; and do not reflect the opinions and beliefs of NASSCOM or its affiliates in any manner. NASSCOM does not take any liability w.r.t. content in any manner and will not be liable in any manner whatsoever for any kind of liability arising out of any act, error or omission. The contents of third-party article/blogs published, are provided solely as convenience; and the presence of these articles/blogs should not, under any circumstances, be considered as an endorsement of the contents by NASSCOM in any manner; and if you chose to access these articles/blogs , you do so at your own risk.

Download Attachment

Devika Agarwal

Call for Inputs: SEBI's consul...

Swapnil